2007-08-08 08:09:51 · 15 answers · asked by $Sun King$ 7 in Environment ➔ Global Warming
Yes, but for many reasons besides the fact that their offices are flooded.
2007-08-08 08:11:57 · answer #1 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Fox New says something when Bush and the new American Corporatism pull the strings attached to there pocket book. This is what makes their mouth move.
In the link below see paragraph 2 second line from the bottom.
2007-08-08 21:17:03 · answer #2 · answered by everymansmedium 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yea, it rained in New York City, and the sewer systems couldn't keep with the rain. That's proof that global warming is man made!
Now we can shut down all research to study "global warming" since we have a new gold standard to measure mans effects on the planet.
2007-08-08 15:40:41 · answer #3 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, they should promote the idea that Global warming is real and that bottled water from a mountain source is bad for the environment so people drink lots of tap water with gusto. That way, people will have more fluoride in their bodies from all that tap water.
Remember, congress passed legislation to get fluoride into our tap waters because the greatest threat to Amercan health was tooth decay? (Baking soda was the old way of brushing your teeth before the invention of fluoride toothpaste and it worked well for everyone.)
It is now known that fluoride causes thyroid disorder and that this is causing all the obesity and health problems in the US. Most people in the US suffer from thyroid disorder and don't know it.
GW will have us pass legislation that will cause so many problems that the fluoride problem will be nothing compared to it. In the meantime, enjoy your fluoride intake in the little ways you can help to stop global warming.
2007-08-08 15:24:59 · answer #4 · answered by Harry H 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I think somebody said that during the Dust Bowl too. Noah denied global warming too...I guess that's HIS just desserts.
All those floods and droughts in history...were ALL of them due to global warming? (Especially the WORST one, the 1887 flood in China where 1 million people died.)
2007-08-08 15:12:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
You're right. Floods never happened before those meddling humans showed up with their automobiles and factories and big brains.
Looks like fox hasn't been pleasing the environment gods again. They better make their sacrifices of reusing seran wrap and driving a hybrid car and bitching about stuff incessantly.
2007-08-08 15:16:31 · answer #6 · answered by Craig A 2 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Why, since flooding has never happened in the history of the world until this year?
2007-08-08 15:13:06 · answer #7 · answered by enicolls25 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Fox News is as unimportant as Al Gore. They both have my blessing to flood as much as they want. More even.
2007-08-08 15:14:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Yes, because floods only started occurring since we came up with AGW. Before that there were never any natural disasters.
2007-08-08 15:16:26 · answer #9 · answered by Scott L 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
FLOODS ARE NOT CAUSE BY GLOBAL WARMING THEY ARE BLAMED ON RAIN STORMS. THERE IS HUNDREDS OF FLOODS EVERY YEAR BUT DO WE BLAME ON GLOBAL WARMING. NO
2007-08-08 15:20:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
i think the water came from a broken pipe or rain, not from a thawing glacier
2007-08-08 15:12:51 · answer #11 · answered by an_articulate_soul 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋