Was this cataclysm of World War I inevitable or could it have been avoided?

Answer 1

There were many factors that led to the First World War and the European powers could not work them at diplomatically.
I do not know of any websites that cover the topic well, but two books give great insight to the events and diplomacy (or lack thereof) leading up to the war: Barbara Tuchman's "The Guns of August" and Robert K. Massey's "Dreadnought". The latter is a great history book.

Answer 2

The most important situation with WWI used to be the treaty, which the US didn't signal. It used to be too punitive on Germany, using the nation into an financial crisis and that crisis triggered WWII. The WWI treaty additionally created a couple of synthetic international locations, redesigned all the obstacles within the Middle East and is the direct purpose of the disorders within the Middle East in these days. You must appear up 2 matters. a million. The Balfour Declaration and a pair of. the Sikes-Picot Agreement. Both may also be accessed on the net. The Sikes-Picot isn't checked out so much at the moment, however it's the root purpose of the rearrangement within the Middle East and the purpose of the gift disorders there.

Answer 3

Inevitable. No general during tht conflict thought too far ahead and most of the generals were cavalry men or colonial fighters. This war was a huge learning curve for many military nations