English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Stern Report and the IPCC Report have already shown us that unless we take measures to halt massive global warming our economies will suffer drastically, and yet you refuse to acknowledge the valid science underlying these reports and actually set targets for greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Without a safe environment and safe living conditions for humanity we will have numerous problems both nationally and internationally, including millions of environmental refugees who will be forced to flee their homelands. Please understand that the environment and economics are inextricably linked and without a safe environment you cannot have good economics.

2007-08-07 14:13:40 · 8 answers · asked by angela c 1 in Environment Global Warming

8 answers

Wait a few years. The climate will cool off by itself, and global warming will be forgotten about just like Y2K was.

2007-08-07 14:18:01 · answer #1 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 2 4

it extremely is a macro economic question. decreasing internet carbon emissions potential decreasing using fossil fuels. the U. S. economic device hemorrhages $450 billion each year for fossil gas imports or approximately $1500.for each guy woman and baby. If kin renewable capability replaced the imported capability at comparable value, there could be one greater $450 billion available as earnings for individuals. some could lose and others could benefit, however the time-honored earnings of individuals could upward thrust by potential of $1500. on the micro economic point, there will be winners and losers. the theory winners are the renewable capability companies and the theory losers are the fossil gas companies. it extremely is a mistake to solid renewable capability into the comparable corporation style as fossil fuels. Small initiatives making use of interior of sight components -wind, photograph voltaic, biomass might properly be extremely worthwhile regionally, yet uneconomic if the capability is moved over greater desirable distances. The fossil gas corporation style demands investment on a large scale in some extensive centers that grant products on a countrywide scale. A small oligarchy with monopoly powers has more desirable to serve the fossil gas marketplace. purchasers are painfully conscious of the value of dependence on that oligarchy. One very final observe. the recent economic device in accordance with renewable capability is now being equipped in examine labs international extensive. persons that placed money into R&D will very own the recent capability economic device. My employer has US patents filed and is arising greater. we are able to grant carbon independent capability at a very good value this is aggressive with fossil gas on an identical time as offering greater interior of sight employment than fossil gas operations. At modern costs it extremely is a worthwhile corporation while the some oil sands operations are actually not worthwhile. possibly we can significant different with huge oil while the value is stable and use their capital to boost speedier. The oil employer will evolve right into a renewable capability employer and acquire the flexibility to tax purchasers continually extremely than only till the oil runs out. How is this an economic disaster?

2016-10-14 09:01:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Oh crap its just not him its most people that worry if there going to eat tomorrow or be able to pay there house payment . There caught in a trap there slaves to the rich either make the payment or get out . Modern day slaves do what the rich man tells you or lose your home car family . They don't whip you anymore they take your things .

We need a change a new way of thinking a new system to stop global warming like it or not but the rich cant keep calling the future they have it all screwed up now

2007-08-07 16:01:14 · answer #3 · answered by dad 6 · 1 2

The environment and economics are as you say, inextricably linked. What you haven't considered is that the efficient use of energy requires a certain amount of wealth; a robust economy. In impoverished countries, the amount of pollution and greenhouse gases released to cook dinner can far outstrip the amount released by an energy efficient house plus transportation to work. We can't make improvements if we can't afford them. You want everything to happen yesterday. Sit down and breathe into a paper bag. It doesn't work like that.

2007-08-07 14:33:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

great point...people dont realize how important our environment and a steady climate is to not only our immediate physical survival but also the survival of our society....think if a hurricane hits New York and Wall Street is flooded...that will kill the stock market and cripple our economy....people dont see the connection but it is so blatantly there, always has been always will be....unfortunately for many of the non-believers their minds can not be changed and it isnt until we see a collapse in some way that people will open their eyes

2007-08-08 01:34:47 · answer #5 · answered by njdevil 5 · 0 2

anyone know why Mr Howard did not reply? lol

serriously though try fixing it yourself quit looking for someone else to do it. I mean crap all the bitching and whinning is getting on my nerves. park you fricken car, build a house in the dirt, ya know. Make a differrence make a stand, don't try to make someone else do it for you......

2007-08-10 13:39:52 · answer #6 · answered by letsget_dangerous 4 · 0 0

Being a smart, well-imformed and in-the-know man, he understands that the whole "Global Warming" bamboozle is just a sham to keep you occupied with yet another pseudo-crisis so the powerful can take more of your money, freedom and liberty.

2007-08-07 14:22:15 · answer #7 · answered by DJ 7 · 4 3

I don't know Mr Howard.

2007-08-09 03:46:01 · answer #8 · answered by margaret moon 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers