nothing wrong with the M16-A2 Service Rifle..its gotten us this far, why change..Primary function: Infantry weapon
Manufacturer: Colt Manufacturing and Fabrique Nationale Manufacturing Inc.
Length: 39.63 inches (100.66 centimeters)
Weight, with 30 round magazine: 8.79 pounds (3.99 kilograms)
Bore diameter: 5.56mm (.233 inches)
Maximum effective range:
Area target: 2,624.8 feet (800 meters)
Point target: 1,804.5 feet (550 meters)
Muzzle velocity: 2,800 feet (853 meters) per second
Rate of fire:
Cyclic: 800 rounds per minute
Sustained: 12-15 rounds per minute
Semiautomatic: 45 rounds per minute
Burst: 90 rounds per minute
Magazine capacity: 30 rounds
Unit Replacement Cost: $586
Features: The M16A2 5.56mm rifle is a lightweight, air-cooled, gas-operated, magazine-fed, shoulder- or hip-fired weapon designed for either automatic fire (3-round bursts) or semiautomatic fire (single shot) through the use of a selector lever. The weapon has a fully adjustable rear sight. The bottom of the trigger guard opens to provide access to the trigger while wearing winter mittens. The upper receiver/barrel assembly has a fully adjustable rear sight and a compensator which helps keep the muzzle down during firing. The steel bolt group and barrel extension are designed with locking lugs which lock the bolt group to the barrel extension allowing the rifle to have a lightweight aluminum receiver.
Background: The M16A2 rifle is a product improvement of the M16A1 rifle. The improvements are:
* heavier, stiffer barrel than the barrel of the M16A1;
* redesigned handguard, using two identical halves, with a round contour which is sturdier and provides a better grip when holding the rifle;
* new buttstock and pistol grip made of a tougher injection moldable plastic that provides much greater resistance to breakage;
* improved rear sight which can be easily adjusted for windage and range;
* modified upper receiver design to deflect ejected cartridges, and preclude the possibility of the ejected cartridges hitting the face of a left-handed firer;
* burst control device, that limits the number of rounds fired in the automatic mode to three per trigger pull, which increases accuracy while reducing ammunition expenditure;
* muzzle compensator, designed to reduce position disclosure and improve controllability and accuracy in both burst and rapid semi-automatic fire;
* heavier barrel with a 1 in 7 twist to fire NATO standard SS 109 type (M855) ammunition which is also fired from the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW). This further increases the effective range and penetration of the rifle cartridge. The M16A2 will also shoot the older M193 ammunition designed for a 1 in 12 twist.
M16A4 Rifle
The M16A4 Rifle is a standard M16A2 Rifle with a flat top upper receiver and detachable carrying handle. The flat top upper receiver has an integral rail that is utilized (when the carrying handle is removed) to mount optical devices to the weapon. The M16A4 Rifle in combination with the M5 Rail Adapter forms the Modular Weapon System (rifle version) which provide soldiers the flexibility to configure their weapons with those accessories required to fulfill an assigned mission. There are no differences between the internal dimensions of the M16A2 Rifle and the M16A4 Rifle.
2007-08-07 14:22:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by LAVADOG 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
mainly any assult rifle i would go with, as long you clean good. There are alot of nice rifles i would use, Here is my top 5 of guns i would use (in order)
1) M-16 (vietnam version, not new small carbines)
2) M-14
3) Ak-47
4) Any FN
5) AK-74
2007-08-07 18:20:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by soccerfan10td 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I needed to use a combat rifle, I would choose an AK-47.
I would also go with the American combat. Yep your right, but America still has the best.
2007-08-07 14:21:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Norskeyenta 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why just have one. For my long distance it would be the M21, still capable enough for close combat, but it can reach out and touch someone. and for regular use, it would be an AK hands down, i like what the one of the people said that the m16 is a good weapon is clean conditions, yea and a combat is surgical clean. my AK has been through mud, sand, snow, rain, submerged. still never a hickup. that tells you something.
The FN version of the SCAR is a Great weapon as well i was just doing an article on one of those.
2007-08-10 03:11:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by JosephC 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Definatly the XM-8.. It is convertible from a pistol to a long rifle, and it does not jam nearly as often as the gas powered POS m-16/m-4 that we are issued now. The ak-47 is also more "combat durable", more powerful, larger caliber, but is slightly less accurate.
2007-08-07 14:20:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Randy H 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ak-47 or M-16 The Ak-47 can take lots of abuse but, the M-16 is a better weapon if in clean conditions. Combat is anything but clean.
2007-08-07 14:19:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FN_SCAR
The future of the Mk.16 and Mk.17 is unclear. In July 2007, the US Army announced a limited competition between the M4 carbine, FN SCAR, HK416, and the previously-shelved HK XM8. Ten examples of each of the four competitors will be involved. Each weapon will fire 6,000 rounds in an "extreme dust environment." The purpose of the shootoff is for assessign future needs, not to select a replacement for the M4.
2007-08-07 15:01:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Izzy N 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have to remark that IMHO everything has been going downhill since the O3A3 Springfield. The entire concept of spray and pray is flawed. The best modern combat rifle I have fired was the 7.62 M14 of the US and the 7.62 short of the AK-47
2007-08-07 14:36:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by oldhippypaul 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
You can improve your vision just by practicing the correct approach for ten minutes a day.
You can check this technique: http://improvevision.toptips.org
Basically what glasses do is bolt the eyes into their refractive state and in order to transparent your lenses you need to keep up the poor vision that the lenses are intended to correct.
This program demonstrates to you a proved method to improve your vision naturally, permanently and with complete results.
2014-09-25 11:18:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most people believe that once they are diagnosed with some vision problem and start wearing eye glasses or contact lenses to correct them, they will have to do so for life in order to see better. Those who want a permanent solution to improve eyesight typically resort to Lasik or other corrective eye surgeries. But you you can also improve your vision without surgery and can see perfectly well without using eyeglasses or contact lenses. You can check here to know how https://tr.im/33c02
2015-01-27 16:55:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋