English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

37 answers

According to the creation museum, there were so many billions of trees floating that the animals used them as rafts to get to their respective homes. I'm not making this up.

2007-08-07 05:59:27 · answer #1 · answered by iamnoone 7 · 2 0

Considering the fact that Christians will argue against the literal interpretation of the 2 of every animal deal, I'm sure they have a dodge for this one too. I read in the encyclopedia that there are about 350,000 different species of beetle on the planet. I asked how Noah was able to care for 700,000 beetles. While some could not understand the math involved (350,000 x 2), and others tried to convince me that all insects can survive floods (even of this magnitude), there were still some who claimed that 1 species of beetle was enough to repopulate all the other species. But don't be alarmed. They still somehow did not evolve into other species because evolution is only a theory and cannot be true. Imbeciles! They'll lie and twist the facts as much as they need to in order to escape the impossibility of this global flood story.

2016-05-20 23:28:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Some of the answers say the polar bear is rather recent. Have not researched it but will some day. They look like albino bears so it will be interesting to see what science says.

I think the climates changed after the flood, in that the waters (deluge) came from a canopy of moisture that was surrounding the earth. Some parts of the ground were connected in past times and broke away. I'm sure it was possible for some of the smaller "islands" to float to other areas, inhabitants and all.

The thought of how various animals made it to certain areas is not that important to me, I have "bigger fish to fry". Not to be mean, but I think it's non believers in God again, with silly answers, trying to make sure that they have it right. Even they can see the scene of the world is changing, and not for the good.

2007-08-07 09:25:39 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It would have been hard to kill off anything in the arctic or antarctic with a flood - ice floats. In fact, it seems likely that if there had been a flood like that described in the Bible, we would all be descended from Eskimos, since there would have probably been thousands of them still alive and only about 8 of Noah's relatives.

In fact, penguins would probably be the most common bird on the planet, too.

2007-08-07 06:03:14 · answer #4 · answered by Azure Z 6 · 1 0

The flood could not have happened - the only water that has ever been or ever will be on this earth is the same water that precipitated out of the oceans during the early eons of the planet's existance...and the same water just keeps raining and evaporating in an endless cycle...there is not enough water to cover all the landmasses, so there never was.
But the answer to your question is that the Polar Bears lived near Mount Arrarat until 1850, then they walked across the Bering Strait and back home.

2007-08-07 06:01:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Well the polar bears would have had to have walked all the way to the middle east in order to get on the ark in the first place, they shouldn't have a problem walking all the way back. Same with the kangaroos - they should have had NO trouble swimming across hundreds of miles of shark infested waters from Australia to the Asian mainland and then hopping all the way there.

Except of course there'd be nothing for them to eat all the way there and back. But the lord moves in completely impossible and illogical ways after all.

2007-08-07 05:57:43 · answer #6 · answered by Mordent 7 · 2 0

I'm not sure. I wasn't there, but I'm sure he dropped them off? Anyways, did you know that some archaeologists actually found the real Ark of Noah in the mountains of Russia? Long time ago though. They can't dig it up because it's deep in the ice. They trying though. They say that the pieces of wood match the kind it said in the Bible. It's big though they can see that. Enough to fit like two of each animal in the Ark? How much more proof does one need? Lol. Amazing huh?

2007-08-07 06:02:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The simple answer is that there weren't any polar bears on the ark. Just some kind of common ancestor bears that eventually through breeding turned into polar bears.

You know...natural selection.

2007-08-07 05:57:38 · answer #8 · answered by Darrell D 3 · 2 0

Haha. Was that before or after Pangaea? I don't know why he had to separate the penguins from the polar bears. Did he drop Santa off, too? Ho.....Ho....Ho.

Red Queen, please find that link. lmao

We must listen to Bush up there. After all, he's a deciiiider.

Thanks a lot Libra, all I see now are polar bears chasing Asians. LMAO

2007-08-07 06:00:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

LOL....it makes me wonder about all the insect species too. For it to be feasable, the ark would have had to have been about the size of new zealand, and had some of the most technologically advanced waste disposal methods ever known to man. Why, oh why do some people still take those stories literally?

2007-08-07 06:02:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers