English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Probably... but what's the difference when the whole business is mere nonsense and mostly plagiarized from other beliefs that came before it.

[][][] r u randy? [][][]
.

2007-08-07 10:17:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Are you really referring to the four beasts in Chapter 7 of the Book of Daniel? If so, then my answer is yes. If not, then my answer is no. The 4 "living creatures" of Ezekiel 1:5 and Rev. 4:6 do not represent these empires.

2007-08-07 03:45:36 · answer #2 · answered by Suzanne: YPA 7 · 3 1

A strong case can be made for it. Has been, in fact.

2007-08-07 03:45:55 · answer #3 · answered by Jack P 7 · 2 0

That would infer that alot of the bible can't be taken literally, and christianity would be up sh** creek!

2007-08-07 03:41:03 · answer #4 · answered by PoseidenNeptuneReturns 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers