What does it mean when a question for the meaning of something is followed by the askers meaning to influence?

Question

Does the asker's own answer result in a limited option to use your own opinion?

Does it seem as though the asker is implying "I want your opinion and I will tell you what it should be."

Answer 1

Obviously they are stating their opinion rather than asking a real question with the genuine intent to learn the other side of the issue. It's a baiting tactic and it can be very limiting, especially if the statement is mostly a drivel and the *asker* had already made their own conclusion before having posted their q's.

Answer 2

Does the asker's own answer result in a limited option to use your own opinion?

No. All you have to do is check out the wide varieties of answers, some of which seem to have little or nothing to do with the question being asked to see that there are no limits to what people might post here on Y/A.

What it means usually is that the Asker is trying to make a statement with their question to get a point across that can be more widely seen than if they just answer another person's question which might not provide the right forum for them to get whatever is on their chest off of it.

Answer 3

a million) it is not that they don't seem to be stimulated by any non secular theory, in basic terms no longer yours. 2) it rather is a fantastically common thank you to kill an animal. How did you like them to kill it? The words have been probable to thank the animal for giving that's life to feed others or something to that consequence. 3) there is no longer something incorrect with polygamy as long as all and sundry's interest. maximum cultures that prepare it have a rule which you will no longer have greater better halves than you may help and look after the two or a max quantity. 4) Why shouldn't they have 'quiet time'? Western society/ religions have not got the marketplace cornered on it. 5) If the tribe became a nomadic one they probable does no longer have plenty, you may no longer shop what you may no longer carry. 6) The previous adage, 'funds does not purchase happiness' is actual. i'm somewhat no longer wealthy yet i'm satisfied. I rather have my relatives, acquaintances, my well-being, a roof over my head and garments on my back. 7) 'elderly chief', properly yeah. In some cultures you do no longer warehouse your previous til they die, you admire and look after them and avail your self of their journey and understanding. you recognize, no longer u.s.. 8) no longer all and sundry sees life and dying interior an identical context as westerners and their priorities are not an identical. larger, badder, quicker won't be greater advantageous to all and sundry. 9) that's totally selfish and regrettably no longer uncommon for westerners to think of that our subculture and our religions have all the solutions. human beings existed and had satisfied and gratifying lives for hundreds of years till now Christianity/Judaism/Islam and could proceed to attain this in spite of them. don't be surprised, be relieved and satisfied for them that they have got stored their course and that that's actual for them.

Answer 4

I believe the question is asked to get attention, and then the "askers answer" is to give their editorial. This doesn't normally influence what I have to say.

Answer 5

It means it isn't really a question it is an opinion. Since that is against community guidelines the put up brief question. Basically it is dishonest.

Answer 6

Perhaps it is to look for reinforcement from others?
Limited option? Maybe.

Answer 7

Yes. That's the intention, most likely