If you had to choose, would you rather be single for the rest of your life, or settle for a less than ideal partner? Why?
2007-08-06 17:30:13 · 5 answers · asked by sunflower 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Nurse, what's with the attitude? Who said I was perfect? Do I know you?
2007-08-07 04:58:53 · update #1
I'd much rather be single than to settle. If you settle, you know you gave up on your dream. If you stay single, you still have hope. Happiness is determined by having a purpose and having friends, so you can be happy without a partner. You cannot be happy if you settle.
2007-08-06 17:42:45 · answer #1 · answered by brad 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Less than ideal partner. Being lonely is hard, and if you can't fall in love with them then maybe you could at least learn to view them as a best friend
2007-08-07 00:34:00 · answer #2 · answered by Megan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Single. I have already settled for less than ideal twice. Silly me, I always thought things would get better...but they didn't.
2007-08-07 00:33:43 · answer #3 · answered by bin there dun that 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably be single, as I could flirt with any guy I wanted, than be stuck with some less than perfect person. He could be a jerk or something. Then I would not be able to be my flirty self if I was tied down to someone.
2007-08-07 00:33:28 · answer #4 · answered by confused. 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one is perfect, not even you.
2007-08-07 00:34:08 · answer #5 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋