2007-08-06 14:12:32 · 9 answers · asked by meinanic 1 in Sports ➔ Auto Racing ➔ NASCAR
no new tracks i say dump pheonix chicago and kansas and send the races back to rockingham and north wilkesboro and a second darlington race
there are already to many races out west.and i dont care if they take away the california speedway race also and sanoma
2007-08-06 15:10:29 · answer #1 · answered by simone219 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No! There are NASCAR tracks in Kentucky, New yourk and Seattle that deserve a race more. They might consider eliminating some of the races that run 2/year and put Kentucky on the schedule.
It really is a great track for the fans
2007-08-10 13:26:58 · answer #2 · answered by NASCARdomis 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be great, but they won't. The most they could hope for is Busch West...maybe. That's only if they can guarantee the minimum seating and ticket sales. They tried to build one in Madera CA, but were denied because they couldn't guarantee 20,000 in ticket sales. They wanted to convert the dirt track already there.
Go Jr.>>>>
2007-08-06 14:18:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
If they do then take away a race from another western track.
Too many tracks take away the quaility of the racing.
2007-08-06 16:20:06 · answer #4 · answered by blakree 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
California already has 3 Cup dates that can't sell out yet. With all to do in CA, the market is just too over-saturated for another Cup date.
2007-08-06 14:40:48 · answer #5 · answered by Jason H 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
how about using some of the older tracks that nascar keeps sweeping away...
2007-08-06 14:26:20 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd like to see NASCAR run one or two Street Cources
2007-08-06 15:06:55 · answer #7 · answered by Paul W 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
that would be way too many tracks in that area and it would be very congested!
2007-08-06 14:50:23 · answer #8 · answered by Fortress of Ice 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That would be awesome.
2007-08-07 00:10:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋