2007-08-06 13:45:21 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
It didn't serve the secret agenda of Bush 2.0 and Cheney,
2007-08-06 13:50:52 · answer #1 · answered by Nancy G 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush 1.0 and Clinton already did it. What would doing it again accomplish? We would probably just have to do it again later.
2007-08-06 23:51:07 · answer #2 · answered by waynersnitzel 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing to bomb. The insurgents dress like you and me, live in homes like you and me, among the innocent civilians, and gather at night to plant bombs.
We are trying to rebuild their infrastructure after we destroyed it. Our goal is to build a democratic (read US ally) government. We can't destroy to build.
2007-08-06 20:55:52 · answer #3 · answered by Joe L 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats a really stupid and irrisposibel question....i know lets all bomb america and see what happens!!!
: P
Your right it wouldnt get rid of sudam becouse he is dead??!!!! hung like two years ago!!!!???
2007-08-06 20:48:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Um, lets see. Wouldn't get rid of Saddamm, stop the terrorists and none of the above all in one.
2007-08-06 20:47:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because you can't control the oil that way. There's no profit in it.
2007-08-07 01:22:38 · answer #6 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋