2007-08-06 12:56:34 · 32 answers · asked by Maurice H 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There is some photo evidence of bigfoot
2007-08-06 13:00:58 · answer #1 · answered by Zappster (Deep Thunker) 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
This is so silly! What kind of answers did you think you would get? This is just a not-so-subtle way of saying that you believe that atheists are more willing to believe in Sasquatch than God. What you don't understand is that atheists, while not believing in any god/s also, for the most part, believe in intelligence and common sense and have a certain amount of skepticism about things like Bigfoot, Nessie, crop circles, etc.
2007-08-06 13:06:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I am willing to remain open to any evidence that can pass reasonable scientific scrutiny.
Meaning repeatable, falsifiable, etc.
My personal *opinion* is that both are manifestations of the collective unconscious, but the possibility of a primitive cousin of man still existing in the mountains somewhere does seem an awful lot more plausible than an invisible deity that wants us to believe in him, but not because we're rational beings who rely on logic, no, but based on a few documents from thousands of years ago and some fuzzy feelings we get when we think about him.
I mean, gee whiz, people. The highest capability we have is the power of reason - so use it!
2007-08-06 13:12:57 · answer #3 · answered by Saul 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am more willing to believe in the possibility of Sasquatch than in the possibility of a deity... There is far more evidence that a Sasquatch exists than that a deity exists..
2007-08-06 13:15:29 · answer #4 · answered by Diane (PFLAG) 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would say Big Foot based on the evidence we presently have. Nobody has told me to give up all of my freedom and 10% of my income to Sasquatch. At least the people who believe in Sasquatch don't have ulterior motives.
2007-08-06 13:02:21 · answer #5 · answered by Graciela, RIRS 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The likelihood of a Sasquatch managing to evolve and hide out does seem more likely than a god doing so. But I find credible evidence for neither. Belief is not a matter of will or choice it is a matter of credible evidence.
2007-08-06 13:03:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes! Just so long as the Sasquatch doesn't claim to be God!
2007-08-06 12:59:31 · answer #7 · answered by starkneckid 4 · 8⤊ 0⤋
I find it easier to believe in the possibility of Sasquatch because unknown primates aren't making false claims about having created the earth and everything on it.
However, until I have proof, neither exists.
2007-08-06 13:02:20 · answer #8 · answered by iamnoone 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Honestly, there's more evidence for the Sasquatch than there is for a god.
2007-08-06 13:02:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
God does not exist. Sasquatch isn't invisible and could be a living primate, but I tend to believe it is a hoax. Two wrongs don't make a right and two hoaxes do not make a truth.
atheist
2007-08-06 12:59:57 · answer #10 · answered by AuroraDawn 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I'm willing to believe in neither.
Of course there are those who suffer from congenital hypertrichosis and a person like that could conceivably be mistaken for a "bigfoot", but that's about the extent to which I'm willing to stretch my imagination.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypertrichosis
http://www.emedicine.com/derm/topic811.htm
2007-08-06 12:57:03 · answer #11 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋