So true my friend...so true, just because we don't know something, they tact on the "It was God" line...or if there is something rather unexplainable they call it a "miracle" like when someone sees the Virgin Marry in their food or something. If you want to know what a REAL miracle is, watch Bruce Almighty, at the end when Jim Carry and Morgan Freeman are talking in Heaven....but the fact is, if scientists look at it, most of the time they can rebuke some, others are truly unexplainable...but then, so are some U.F.O. cases, and Bigfoot cases, are those miracles? No, they're unexplainable...it's annoying and it shows a repugnant mind that implies that anything we can't prove must be supernaturally endowed.
2007-08-06 04:46:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Logic doesn't follow here. Just because Science hasn't yet discovered the answers you can't assume that it is or isn't supernatural. There is no proof either way for an answer.
No one can prove one way or the other. It is a losing question to keep asking over and over again when there is no proof that it exists and there is not proof that it doesn't exist.
2007-08-06 13:00:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Unity 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I get it; crazy is marketing anxiety because you fear the true understanding of love. Well here is a little help - Love is like eating Oreo cookies (once you taste one you’ll forget about everything else).
Yes, there are many examples in history that we can not fully understand, but only because we have not changed our method of understanding and thinking.
Even your reasoning is lacking in creative foresight (e.g.: you’re logic is constrained by “I need to blame a Christian”), not on how to expand rational comprehension and/or understanding.
Maybe, it is really possible that understanding (science) is directly link with human awareness. That is to say, until we can develop the methodology for bridging our selfish resistance of understanding we’ll never achieve a higher level of consciousness.
Maybe God’s true message is all about expanding our comprehension of love, respect, and understanding.
Maybe we should start focusing on cooperation and stop feeding the demon of differences!
God Bless!
2007-08-06 12:35:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Freeman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have you seen the movie Field of Dreams? Ray and his wife and daughter and Terrance Mann can all see the baseball players. But her brother and other strangers CAN’T see them.
Of course church looks like non-sense, and people sitting around praying to a non-existent “God.”
You’re saying, just because you can’t explain it, doesn’t mean it’s God. Using your logic, just because you don’t know it’s God, doesn’t mean it’s not.
Hundreds of millions of people around the world, for thousands and thousands of years have all been in contact with the same God.
We can all see the baseball players. Just because you can’t see them, doesn’t mean they aren’t there.
2007-08-06 11:48:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by jimmeisnerjr 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You make a valid point .....however, it does not cover ALL the bases.
Although, when God does things man cannot explain, the word 'supernatural' is perhaps a poor choice.
It only means mankind has not caught up to God's abilities ....and never will.
2007-08-06 11:49:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Uncle Thesis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Agreed.
I am still waiting for science though to explain how matter came into being at what they call the "big bang" where they agree there was no matter previously.
In essence, science is declaring matter came out of nothing.
If that isn't "supernatural" then what is it?
.
2007-08-06 11:44:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hogie 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It depends on the intent of the individual and their own causes and conditions. Some are being "lazy" others simply might not know any better. As long as they're not causing harm and suffering while learning wisdom and altruism... I think we don't need to worry about it.
_()_
2007-08-06 11:49:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by vinslave 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Good to see it here. The fact scientists don't understand it doesn't make it supernatural, and it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It only means scientists don't understand it.
Same as everything else scientists don't understand that might or mightn't exist.
2007-08-06 11:46:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jack P 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sssshhhh! You want to spoil our business? Priestcraft has set up a thriving business of what you call "lazy thinking". Let's do their thinking for them and smile to the banks, since many people will rather die than think!
2007-08-06 11:50:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Akimbo 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Archaeologists have long ago proved the truth of the Bible. You just don't want to believe because you don't want to answer to anyone. But you will, one day and Darwin won't be there to hide behind. Each person will answer for their self.
2007-08-06 11:47:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by tolerance-Jn3:16,Acts2:38 2
·
0⤊
1⤋