English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 years ago they found the fossil remains of a fish with 6 legs that lived about 370 million years ago. It was discovered in canada on the rockies

in 1998 in australia near ularu (ayars rock) scientists found the skeletons of an aboriginal man and woman whom they say lived about 50 thousand years ago. These skeletons resembled more of an ape/man

I wonder how religious people will understand these discoveries?

2007-08-06 03:00:13 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

to those who want links and proof i say this

this is what i saw on tv, read in newspapers . i even saw the fossil remains of the fish and skeletons of the man on tv

i dont know how to find the weblinks. why dont you do some research and try to find it

i am sure you will get the proof

2007-08-06 03:13:16 · update #1

27 answers

perhaps you could give me some links, maybe 5-10 different sites showing these stories ( must be the Canada and Australia story ), then i can make a more objective informed answer. i will be awaiting your links.

peace

2007-08-06 03:08:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Six-legged fish?

Not a usual thing, I warn you.
The only reason a fish or indeed any other vertebrate would have 6 limbs is if there was some kind of screw-up during foetal development. Similar to the way some people these days have 11 or 12 fingers.

2007-08-06 03:07:00 · answer #2 · answered by Roger C 2 · 1 0

They found a fish with six legs. Great! Did they find evidence that this fish with six legs became a butterfly? Or did they find just another species that lived millions of years ago?
And the skeleton? Was it a man or ape? I saw a mountain that resembled a human body once....
More recently they found a fish in Asia, thought to be extinct. However, no changes were noted on this fish, even though fossils were found dating back to 360 million years ago.

2007-08-06 03:06:00 · answer #3 · answered by Starjumper the R&S Cow 7 · 3 2

well first of all the fact that a fish was discovered on the rockies is evidence of a world flood as in the account of Genesis in the bible and a skeleton of a man only shows someone who was malnutritioned or handicapped just the same as we have many people even today that have deformaties and problems that would constitute an abnormal skeleton.

2007-08-06 03:07:58 · answer #4 · answered by disciple 4 · 2 0

Did you see in the news last week where scientists dropped a camera off the east coast of Canada I think. Anyway, they didn't think anything could be living at that depth. They discovered entirely new species of fish, clams and coral never seen before. Very exciting stuff.

2007-08-06 03:15:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The scientists are men too they can only explain what they Think they know (with this type of past stuff) So I think Its implausible to pinpoint anything we don't have in the here and now I mean who's to say George Washington Existed we didn't see Him we just rely on what the history books say.

2007-08-06 03:13:18 · answer #6 · answered by Bobbie 5 · 0 0

What I could say approximately this (and distinctive different discoveries) is that it variety of feels that scientists do not understand while to quit including yet another nought onto each and all ages they think of up. including noughts has strengthen into addictive in technological know-how.

2016-10-09 08:03:08 · answer #7 · answered by cracchiolo 4 · 0 0

How in the world can those sceitific findings contradict relgious beleifs?
How do you know that were ape-men, as you say, and not merely apes.
Above that, there are billions of yet undiscovered secrets in the vastness of the universe, that are all proof for the greatness of God, who created you, I, and whaterver there is in the universe.

2007-08-06 04:03:20 · answer #8 · answered by Nader Ali 4 · 0 0

I see you are getting the usual barrage of hate and missinformation.

Well what can you expect. We have known about genetics, and how alleles of different genes give rise to different color and spots in animals and plants since Mendel cultivated and tested pea plants between 1856 and 1863, which gave rise to Mendel's Laws of Inheritance.

But Christians will tell you that making cows and sheep drink water where branches of green poplar, hazel and chestnuts with white strips on them will cause the the animals to have cattle and sheep that are stripped and spotted.

2007-08-06 03:31:00 · answer #9 · answered by whatotherway 7 · 1 0

All is possible. You know I dont think it says exactly how god made man just that he did. Doesn't rule out evolution. No one really knows so I just live life day by day ya know. Its kinda like how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

2007-08-06 03:06:33 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 2 0

They will use all the vast resources of the church groups to launce a smear campaign designed to smear the people who discoved them and suppress the findings. In 2 years there be little or no trace of this to be found.

Same as they have done for 1,500 years.

2007-08-06 03:05:02 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers