Absolutely not. If he's unexperience, all I have to do is teach him or learn together. He's worth it from what you decribed about him. Moreover,it's the heart which is important not the moves.
2007-08-05 19:37:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by tastesofheaven 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
IF the girl has had a relationship with a "naive" guy before, YES it would be a turn off. It is VERY frustrating and at times infuriating to have many years experience and be with someone who knows little to nothing. It CAN work, but only if both agree to be PATIENT, understanding, and above all, OPEN to learning. My hubby of 13 years was VERY naive when we started dating - it has been a real challenge, it is great now, BUT, I would never do it again.
2007-08-06 02:46:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by BikerChick 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I distrust any guy who treats anyone like a "princess" unless they really are a princess (where mommy and daddy really are king and queen). Over time you get comfortable with each other and certain little things just aren't done anymore, the next thing you know, the girl is on Yahoo Answers whining that her man doesn't pay her any attention and do the "little" things he used to and the man is on Yahoo Answers talking about the selfish snob he married.
2007-08-06 02:37:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by janicajayne 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
His inexperience wouldn't be a turn-off for me--I think that people get busy with different things in their lives and sometimes they just don't meet the person they want to have a romantic relationship with for a while.
I like the idea that a person doesn't just go with anyone just to go with someone,but actually waits until he really likes someone.
I would hope that he wouldn't be afraid to experience a relationship, though--you know, that he wouldn't have to be pulled kicking and screaming through every experience.
2007-08-06 02:38:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by LC 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't care about experience, in a relationship. Because you'd hate to be kissed the same as he kissed his last girlfriend! And a girl might feel abit vulnerable if a guy knows everything.
I would date a guy even if he was inexperienced, it'll add to the passion of the relationship... that way he can learn how to kiss me the way I like it and mean it. (And learn other things *wink wink*)
2007-08-06 02:45:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by mandband 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Id like it even more!! I like knowing girls haven't mauled him.. I like being one of the only girls he is willing to go further with. I hate the idea of some man-whore, or someone whos done everything, b/c Id enjoy learning together..and not feeling silly myself-that I am not as experienced. So its a plus!
2007-08-06 02:39:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by ursoolastsumer 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, that alone isn't a dealbreaker for me. And you could always go for women on the younger side of the spectrum, so that you're more likely to be compatible in that regard. Good luck.
2007-08-06 02:37:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by flankerji 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
hmmm on the contrary, it's a turn on. easier to train :)
seriously, in a relationship, one has to be experienced or more experienced so that the other will learn. as we grow old and as we go through so many relationships, we develop a "culture", we learn more about ourselves and we learn whom we want to become. in short, we all go through the same stage so you should be fine! :)
2007-08-06 02:40:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Eiann 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no - honestly experience doesn't matter to me...what concerns me though might be his inability to handle situations because he's never really been IN one...i'm sure he's seen it through an outsider's point of view but it's DIFFERENT and alot harder once you're involved - when your feelings and her feelings are at stake...also another concern is their maturity level but other than that....experience doesn't really matter - just keep being respectful ;)
2007-08-06 02:37:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not really. Of course every girl has different limits, but in general most won't mind inexperience.
2007-08-06 02:38:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anna 2
·
0⤊
0⤋