A belly button is actually a scar. It’s where you were attached to your mother’s womb through the umbilical cord. After you’re born, the cord is cut, and you’re left with this very obvious scar.
In other words, a belly button is proof you were born of a woman!
Now think about this: Adam and Eve weren’t born this way. They were direct acts of creation by God. Adam was made directly from dust; Eve was created directly from Adam’s side. Thus, there’s no reason to believe Adam or Eve would have had such a scar.
Even our belly button should remind us that we’re children of Adam, the first man who rebelled against his Creator—thus we’re all sinners in need of salvation .
2007-08-05 18:18:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by mysongsrhis 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I was watching a documentary about this obese woman. She lost weight, but her skin was hanging down to her knees. The doctors removed the excess skin (34 pounds) and so had to cut off her belly button. But because a person physically needs a belly button-the doctors said it is the connection between the outside skin and all of the inner organs and such, that holds everything in place-so the doctors had to make her a new belly button. So even though Adam and Eve weren't Born from another human, they still needed their belly buttons, and so God would have provided them belly buttons.
2007-08-05 18:20:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sandra B 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
No human parents. But they were primates, and undoubtedly had primate parents, who were mammals and therefore had belly buttons. Specifically, the Bible says that God formed the biological "man" from inorganic matter ("the dust of the earth"), by an unspecified process. Science has now revealed that process. However, the biological "man" didn't become human until God "breathed into him" spiritual life, an immortal soul and moral capacity. At that moment the first human being was created in God's image and likeness.
2007-08-05 18:25:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by PaulCyp 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
i don't think of Genesis is a financial ruin, even though it incorporates "chapters". as a techniques simply by fact the tummy button, although you choose to fantasize approximately Eve is as much as you. i became only thinking, whether Eve became thoroughly hideous looking, Adam nonetheless could've been along with her simply by fact he did not have the different techniques (different than perhaps a number of the animals). additionally, i ask your self what Adam concept while Eve informed him that she have been fidgeting with that speaking snake.
2016-11-11 08:23:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Adam and Eve you speak of aren't real. The Adam and Eve millions of years ago may not have. Evolution could be a reason why we are fed through umbilical cords.
2007-08-05 18:15:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by juicedaman 2
·
2⤊
4⤋
LOL! I read this same question in the comic strip "Curtis" in today's newspaper!!
Coincidence?? I think not!!
BTW, why don't you start talking about dinosaurs and what not to really prove your cunning intellectual advantage over Christians... Or you could shoot yourself.... In the balls...
2007-08-05 18:21:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by slapperflapper 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't think they did. Why
would they have need for one.
2007-08-05 18:19:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by PokerChip 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No
2007-08-05 18:15:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Augustine 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I doubt it.
2007-08-05 18:15:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Adam R 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Frank........honestly.........does it matter?
They probably didn't. But it is irrelevant.
2007-08-05 18:16:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by K in Him 6
·
1⤊
2⤋