Creationists/Anti-evolutionists...?

Question

How many of you creationists have actually formally learned about evolution. It does not say man descended from apes as that is what you all seem to say. You say the fossil record is incomplete, but do you really think that every single fossil is going to be found? Besides, DNA similarities make up for the holes in the fossil record. DNA similarities may not sound like a lot but if you had actually learned about DNA you would see how similar and how much evidence is derived from that. Finally, it is not based on the fact the humans and monkeys look alike. I have actually seen that a few times.

Wayne T is one of those people.

Did you know that gravity is also a theory. Do you believe in gravity?

Darwin did not know about DNA, which gives evolution a lot more credit.

I mean his statement does not apply as much anymore.

Answer 1

Creationism isn't science... it's anti-science!

Answer 2

i might extremely choose to be waiting to hook you as much as a polygraph and ask you some questions approximately your question. especially, i choose to nicely known while you're stupid and as such honestly have self assurance what you in simple terms wrote or while you're intentionally deceptive people. i think it is the former, however the latter does not suprise me the two. permit's verify out the question, we could? you're saying that there is "... important historic info of the human race evolving critically from mere cave dwellers right into a race so effective that we are waiting to regulate the powers of nature...." factor a million: important is a subjective observe and you used it two times in this area of your question! as quickly as somebody calls you on it, you're saying, "nicely, it is important to me!" in case you like any credibility, be particular approximately what your asserting. factor 2: You recommend interior the 1st area that there is crucial historic info for what? A GEICO commercial like so-basic-even-a caveman can do it CAVEMAN, as in an earlier sort of guy on the human evolutionary scale? we at the instant are not basically speaking approximately completely progressed people who got here approximately to stay in caves through fact industrialization had not yet taken place? See? you're being imprecise! no person denies that people dwelled in caves. yet lots of persons who admit that, deny that they've been in a roundabout way under cutting-side-day guy's equivalent. they simply lived in caves through fact they mandatory shield and caves have been there! that's not cavemen like we've come to think of of cavemen! question: the place is the important historic info for those early evolutionary cave dwellers? You adult men have been speaking approximately "the lacking link" for some years now! question 2: You call it "the lacking link," yet considering you are able to not tutor it even exists then ... nicely, how are you able to tell the type between an imagined link and one that exists yet can not be stumbled on? question 3: How does important historic info selection from ... oh, i don't understand, say ... info? directly to the final area of your fact: "... a race so effective that we are waiting to regulate the powers of nature...." question: WHAT powers of nature can this cutting-side-day super race administration? Earthquakes? Noooooooooo! Hurricanes? Nooooooooo! Tornadoes? Nooooooooooo! Floods? Noooooooooo! Ice storms? Nooooooooo! Snowstorms? Nooooooooooo! What a shaggy dog tale!

Answer 3

Darwin was right

we humans carry 98.6% chimpanzee DNA

Answer 4

I Used to teach evolution...

It is amazing to me that laymen who push evolution theory so vehemently don't even know what most evolutionary scientists have said about the fossil record....

Even Charles Darwin was honest when he confesses in 'Origin of Species'; " But as by THIS THEORY innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we NOT find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?" -Charles Darwin

To the above fact, even the most world renown (evolutionary) biologists agree...." New species almost always appear suddenly in the fossil record with NO intermediate links to ancestors in older rocks in the same region. The fossil record with its abrupt transitions OFFERS NO SUPPORT for gradual change". - Stephen J. Gould (Natural History , June, 1977, p.22)

"The extreme rarity (of transitional forms) in the fossil record persists as the 'trade secret' of palentology. The evolutionary tree (diagarms) that adorn our textbooks is.....NOT the evidence of fossils". - Stephen Gould (Natural History, 1977, vol.86, p.13)

According to Scripture NOTHING evolved but everything was created "AFTER THEIR KIND"....which is directly consistent with the fossil record.

The thing to remember is that evolution is just a theory, a speculation, an unproven assumption....not a proven fact.

"From the beginning of the Creation God made them male and female..."-- Jesus (Mk. 10:6

Answer 5

You define yourself as a patriot, which is prima facie evidence the rest of what you say is probably nonsense.

Answer 6

Rev. Albert Einstein:
"I Used to teach evolution..."

forgive me if i'm skeptical. where? what grade? were you one of those gym teachers roped into teaching biology because no one else was even remotely capable?

Answer 7

It's not easy to accept that we evolved from pond scum, but there it is.

Answer 8

alrighty then.