English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm shopping for a new digital camera, and all the models that interest me have no viewfinder, "LCD only." This seems like it might be a problem, since if the LCD screen breaks, or there is a glare on the screen, it will be difficult to line up a good shot. How important is the viewfinder on a digital camera, and why do so many compact and subcompact cameras have LCD only, rather than a viewfinder and and LCD like the other cameras I've owned? Do you have any suggestions for a good camera under $400 with good shutter lag?

2007-08-05 14:03:27 · 10 answers · asked by Swedish Meatball 87 1 in Consumer Electronics Cameras

10 answers

Not important. You will not use it. The only time it may be helpful is when you are outside and the sun is so bright you can't see your screen really well. My camera does not have one and I am fine with that. The one I have is the Fuji Finepix F20. I did a lot of research and it got really good reviews from professional photographers. It is simple to use and takes great pics and is priced very competitively for all the features.

2007-08-05 14:09:23 · answer #1 · answered by Aimers 4 · 0 0

Large LCD viewfinders eat batteries. It seems nice to have a big LCD monitor, but they are power hungry. You will have to do what you can to turn the thing off as soon as you don't need it any longer. Look for "Power Save" in your menu. Set it to shut off at the shortest possible innterval after you take the picture. Set it so that it doesn't not display unless you tap the shutter button to wake it up. Even this will not go a long way towards conserving batteries.

Of course, rechargeable batteries are the way to go, but you might want to get some Energizer e² Lithium batteries for cameras. They cost twice as much, but last four times as long.

I lament the passing of the optical viewfinder and I would choose almost any camera with an optical viewfinder over one that only has an LCD viewfinder. Why?

1. You never have the option of turning off the LCD and these things eat batteries for lunch and spit them out. Why do away with the option of a viewfinder that has zero electrical drain?

2. It can be difficult to see the image on an LCD in bright sunlight, even if they are "new and improved."

3. You have to hold an LCD viewer out at some distance in front of your face. This is more conspicuous than I prefer to be all the time.

4. The need to hold a camera at arms length will introduce some shake. I like the idea of stabilizing a camera against my face when I am taking a picture. This is especially important with a longer zoom lens. No wonder "image stablization" or "vibration reduction" is necessary with these cameras. Not that there's anything WRONG with IS or VR, but it is really a requirement with LCD viewfinders and telephoto lenses.

5. Using the LCD to view photos after you've taken them slows down the camera quite a bit. You can't shut of the LCD monitor and still take pictures if you don't have an optical viewfinder.

2007-08-05 14:12:41 · answer #2 · answered by Picture Taker 7 · 3 0

The LDC gives you "what you see is what you get" whereas a viewfinder won't always give you this. Let's say you're lining up a nice closeup shot of a flower.. The viewfinder is a good inch away from the shutter, so your picture will be off center, or worse, cropped. This applies to regular point and shoot cameras, in an SLR, you look through the lens via the viewfinder. I don't have info on shutter lag, maybe you should visit http://www.dpreview.com/ this is a site which users review digital cameras of all kinds.

2007-08-05 14:13:10 · answer #3 · answered by Bob Thompson 7 · 1 0

If the LCD screen breaks, you are unlikely to have a usable camera. The viewfinder becomes vital when the day is so bright that you can't see the screen or so dark unless it has back lighting. I use the viewfinder on my Nikon 995 about 1 shot in 10.

2007-08-05 14:08:06 · answer #4 · answered by Mike1942f 7 · 1 0

the reliable P&S cameras oftentimes have the two. If the digicam is designed to industry to any sort of photographer, they might have a viewfinder. and distinctive expert Photographers do have P&S that they create with them as its not continuously functional to have the SLR cameras with you everywhere. i understand the top end Canons, and Sony or maybe some Kodak have it. i think of a few fo the Nikons do to. the right Panasonic does additionally. i replaced into very inspired with the recent Canon SX10 IS. It has the two and the demonstrate computer screen is transportable and hence you are able to circulate it so which you will see as you shoot around a corner, or from down low or circulate it so the glare isn't on it. a beneficial characteristic, and upload the 20X zoom on it, its super. It replaced into additionally beneficial that they placed a conversion demonstrate on the lens, so which you realize approximately what selection you're shooting, in comparison on your pals that have an slr. very beneficial touch. And the digital noise interior the photographs is somewhat low, even at ISO 800 and above. I carry a Canon G9 with me as quickly as I dont have one among my massive cameras, considering you by no potential understand once you will get the wonderful shot, or the moose would be smilling at you or such. and that i like it. the image high quality is sizable. I honestly have honestly achieved some 11x14 with it and it replaced into at iso 4 hundred. i replaced into very delighted with the outcomes. Its a sprint massive, yet nonetheless suits in a pocket and that's basic to apply for my boys, and that i can use it like I do my considerable cameras besides, that's somewhat beneficial. I by no potential use my viewscreen, yet my boys choose to, and its beneficial to be waiting to have the two in i mandatory them.

2016-10-09 07:17:51 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I recently purchased a Kodak Camera from Staples and so far has been a great buy. You have the option of using the LCD or the viewfinder. Also, it has a very good optical zoom, which will allow for more artistic photos if you're interested. They have several Kodaks, but the one I'm referring to cost three hundred and was on sale for two hundred and fifty. Consumer reports gave it a good rating.

Good Luck!

2007-08-05 14:11:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As an old-timer who has owned Single Lens Reflex cameras since 1971 I can't imagine not having an optical viewfinder.

I do kinda enjoy watching people trying to take photos while holding the camera between thumb and forefinger with the camera 2' from their face. I often wonder what kind of results they get...

2007-08-09 01:52:31 · answer #7 · answered by EDWIN 7 · 0 0

It won't eat your batteries nearly as quick as using the LCD screen exclusively. My Sony DSC-H2 is just 1 second between shots. 6 megapixels, 12X optical zoom. Gives excellent 8X10 and has image stabilizer. Comes with battery charger, and has viewfinder. I always use the viewfinder.

2007-08-05 14:09:18 · answer #8 · answered by Vintage Music 7 · 1 0

The view finder is not that important and a lot of times if you use the veiw finder your shots will be mis lined since your not looking thought the lens but a spot slightly higher and sometimes to one side.

2007-08-05 14:13:57 · answer #9 · answered by Jen D 2 · 0 0

when the batteries are low you can turn off the display to conserve power

2007-08-05 14:06:05 · answer #10 · answered by budda 3 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers