Should Bush & Cheney be held responsible for the troops that have died?

Question

http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0oGkkrWa7ZGxoMBPS1XNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTExY281YmEwBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA3NrMQR2dGlkAwRsA1dTMQ--/SIG=11ecfiddo/EXP=1186446678/**http%3a//www.physics911.net/

Answer 1

YES!! yes yes yes YES!!!!!

they should be held responsible for LYING to the american public and basically sending our brave men and women to their deaths for NO REASON!!! Iraq didnt attack us, why are we there, losing an average of 3 soldiers a day?!?!?!?!

baby bush and cheney should be brought up on war crimes!! every INTELLIGENT american knows the truth!!

Answer 2

permit me permit you realize a sprint secret, Lisa. GW replaced into an Air rigidity fighter pilot. possibly which potential little to you, yet to those that are attentive to all that involves, it potential he replaced right into a somewhat sensible individual. otherwise, he'd have by no potential been allowed in that cockpit. he's not a reliable public speaker, yet then few actual everyone seems to be. He each and every now and then listens to point he don't have, yet then who hasn't achieved an identical element. Mr. Bush feels the shortcoming of those protection rigidity people plenty extra deeply than you do, I promise you. in simple terms through fact he has the middle to do what he believes is powerful and is not afraid to make a command determination, in simple terms through fact he does not placed on his emotions on his sleeve does not recommend he's a foul individual. to the different, it is the mark of a guy. You goofy liberals bypass forward and chew on him. the folk that remember understand extra acceptable.

Answer 3

Should every President be responsible for active duty military members who die in peace time? 9,555 active duty members died between 1980 and 1984. And what has Vice President Richard Cheney got to with it? He's the President of the Senate. He's not in the military chain of command!

Answer 4

Should Woodrow Wilson have been held responsible for the 239,000 American Soldiers Killed in His Presidency?

Should FDR have been held responsible for the 407,000 American Soldiers Killed in his Presidency?

Should Harry Truman been held responsible for the 33,000 American Soldiers Killed in his Presidency?

Should Lyndon Johnson have been held responsible for the 38,000 American Soldiers Killed in his Presidency?

Should Nixon for the 20,000 of his?

Jimmy Carter for the loss of Life at "Desert One" in 1979?


Your question is typically vacant and feckless....

Answer 5

Not unless you hold Wilson responsible for WWI deaths, FDR accountable for all WWII deaths, Truman responsible for all Korean War deaths, and LBJ responsible for all Vietnam deaths. We could have avoided ALL of those wars if we had tried hard enough, so they are all guilty under your reasoning. All of those wars killed more Americans than Iraq. So, unless you blame all of them for the deaths in their wars, you are a hypocrite.

Answer 6

No... they might be blamed for the state of unpreparedness but other than that.. why? Its a war... soldiers die in wars... compared to most was already the Iraq War has seen the lowest casualties.

Answer 7

Unfortunately, troops die in every war. The president has the authority to send troops to war. How would you hold them responsible? Sue them? Send them to jail? You may not agree with what they are doing, but they have the legal authority to do it.

Answer 8

No more than yourself.

Here you are cheerleading for the enemy - yet you refuse to accept responsibility for the deaths that you encouraged.

Answer 9

No, just as LBJ and Kennedy were not liable for Vietnam.

Answer 10

bush & cheney should be sent to Iraq, afterall bush was in the military wasn't he and cheney has proven he knows how to use a gun