who ever is backing up is at fault
2007-08-05 11:29:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Velocity is just not an predicament on your case. In all States of which i'm mindful, the traffic laws fluctuate little or no. Whether pulling out of a car parking zone, pulling out of a driveway, or pulling out at an intersection, the motive force have to yield to oncoming traffic. Reporting it to the insurance manufacturer, they will pay something over the deductible. If the insured is not at fault, frequently they will "go after" the other driver for what they put out. You would have got to do the same for deductible recuperation. With the other character being at fault, they'd must pay not handiest your deductible, however court docket charges as well. If the police were known as, make sure you have got a duplicate of the police record.
2016-08-04 09:02:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is tricky.
If your car is not moving, then there is a GOOD chance the other person is at fault if you go to court. If both are moving, you may lose. Usually, whoever hit the tail end of a car is at fault. This is because you are looking at the car in front of you. Hope this is not real for you.
2007-08-05 12:55:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by musicABC 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not knowing what state or province or even country you live in, nobody here can answer with any certainty that you can take to the bank. And even then, it depends on how you were parked. In my state, if you weren't legally parked, it doesn't make much difference who was at fault. Your insurance takes care of your car, their insurance takes care of theirs.
I'm a little surprised that they didn't cover this in the classroom portion of your Driver's Ed class.
2007-08-05 11:32:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ralfcoder 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
well it will be the other persons fault who is backing up.
I was backing up once and i hit someones car and the insurance said its my fault
2007-08-09 09:35:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by rubys 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
That is a tough one. Depends on a lot of different scenario's. Just because someone is backing out does not necessarily make them at fault. That is usually one for the insurance co experts.
2007-08-05 11:34:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ron F 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Generally speaking, the person backing is at fault as they are not supposed to start moving until it is safe to do so. Hitting someone would be a pretty good indicator it was not safe to do so.
2007-08-05 11:31:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by oklatom 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The person backing up. Especially if your car was parked or not moving at the time of the collision.
2007-08-05 11:34:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Precious Gem 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
who ever hit you, unless you backed in to someone else,if you was setting still,and someone backed in to it,they are at fault,you have to have a police report on this either way to let the insurance company settle out on it,good luck on it.
2007-08-05 11:34:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by dodge man 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
depends where you live and who is backing up in Wisconsin you would be partly at fault just for getting hit by someone else
2007-08-05 11:30:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by unaturalyaspirated 3
·
0⤊
0⤋