1. dr s.gould (evolution now)p. 140 no one has ever documented a genuine tansitional fossil linking major kinds of animals.
2.hbj earth science 1989 p. 326. speaking of the geologic column cannot be found anywhere except in the textbooks and in the minds of those who believe it.
3.evolution, a theory in crisis by michael denton(a evolutionist)numerous experiments in labs have confirmed that life could not have risen by chance and that animals always produce the same basic kind of life.
4.w.e. swinton british museum of natural history london said;there is no fossil evidence of the stages through which the remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved.
5. dr colin paterson;senior palentolgist british museum of natural history.absolutly no missing links exist between major kinds of animals as many major evolutionists have admitted.
i could really keep going and going like the energizer bunny on this ,but why evolutionist are dead in the water,and they know it.
itted.
2007-08-05 10:36:32 · 17 answers · asked by ronbo 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
*wonders if he actually read the works he cites or did he just believe blindly what the author of some Christian book full of quotes taken out of context wrote*
2007-08-05 10:42:11 · answer #1 · answered by atheist 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
There are equally persuasive arguments on the other side of this issue. More and more people are coming up without wisdom teeth...why? We don't need them so we are evolving; eventually no one will have them. WHO CARES? I believe in evolution because it seems very logical to me. I also believe in creationism. God created the world and everything in it. It is obvious that an intelligence produced the intricate lifeforms existing in the world. Just as a primitive man stumbling upon an intricate man-made machine would have to assume there was an intelligence behind it, we have to assume an intelligence is behind the intricacy of a leaf, a flower petal, a blade of grass, any tiny organism, because all the cells work in symphony with all the others for the good of the entire organism somewhat like the intricate machine but much less crude. God is creator and has caused all organisms to adapt to their changing environment. In doing this they must evolve and God oversees this evolution. Why is this a question of one or the other, creationism or evolution? The two are not mutually exclusive. And whether or not man evolved from apes is a moot point.
2007-08-05 11:01:18 · answer #2 · answered by Barbara E 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't really understand the question all that much. I mean in the bible Adam and Eve made clothes because they were ashamed and embarrassed of being naked, as most humans tend to be self conscious. But there are plenty of reasons to wear clothes, whether it is for warmth, for looks, or just to stay out of trouble. This is not by any means a creationist vs evolutionist argument in my opinion.
2016-05-19 11:09:58 · answer #3 · answered by thersa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"there is no fossil evidence of the stages through which the remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved"
because feathers dont fossilise that well...birds are still closely related to reptiles as they lay eggs. some dinosaurs could fly and had beaks. I think Ill just go on faith then.
2007-08-05 10:41:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hi,
For all the would-be scientist on this board that claim to understand the chemistry behind the mystery, I would like you to go back to you blackboards and lap-tops to please reexamine the weight of C, and please explain to me why it has the Atomic weight it has. Once you can wrap your minds around this element and it's properties you can come back to play the question and answer game. Until then, I suggest you brush up on your math skills because this lesson will be long and hard on all of us. Read The God Particle, and you might get out of the classroom for recess. I for one believe that the universe has the mind of God written all over it, and this ain't no accident.
2007-08-05 11:21:24 · answer #5 · answered by skiingstowe 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Have you ever considered that maybe those fossils haven't been found yet? Or that those are the same kinds of "scientists" that say that obesity is a contagious disease?
2007-08-05 10:45:30 · answer #6 · answered by Mög T.H.E. Tormentor 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Here is my take on your question. I firmly believe that you picked out statements that fitted your agenda in a silly attempt at trying to discredit evolution and make us think that "POOF" we came into existence has no flaws.
2007-08-05 10:45:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
You lost me at tansitional fossil
2007-08-05 10:41:40 · answer #8 · answered by t_rex_is_mad 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
believe it or not, SOME people do realize that evolution is not without flaws.
2007-08-05 10:40:58 · answer #9 · answered by superwow_rl 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Good point ..many evolutionist "wanna bees" don't realize yet that there are NO transitional fossils.
.but next time print one ....and make it more clear.
2007-08-05 10:44:47 · answer #10 · answered by Thomas P 1 · 0⤊ 5⤋