Every few days someone cites a scientific-sounding name, then you go look it up, and it was setup a few months ago by Answers in Genesis or whatnot so AIG can cite themselves without sounding like they're citing themselves.
Where can I get a full list of such publications?
2007-08-05 07:35:12 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
AIG is the best list, pretty much everything they mention you can rest assured its wrong
2007-08-05 07:38:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance--that principle is contempt prior to investigation."--Herbert Spencer
Have you ever read anything by Dr. Hugh Ross? Dr. Walt Brown? Mr. Perry Marshall? The creation science ministries? None of these people are affiliated with AIG and their papers have been peer reviewed even by hostile audiences like yourself obviously. Dr. Ross has a PhD in Physics and astronomy, Dr. Brown has a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from MIT and Mr. Marshall has a Masters in Computer Science. I guess you believe just because you are an atheists or agnostic you are smarter than these learned men? I bet you're too smart to even have a college degree. What does someone of your obvious brilliance need a college degree for anyway, right? Try education with open mindedness you might actually learn something, child.
Oh and your Messiah, Richard Dawkins always cites himself and his own works as "truth" to his own arguments. He like the rest of you atheists are self-centered in the extreme. No wonder you don't believe in God. You can't comprehend anything greater than yourself.
2007-08-05 07:52:00 · answer #2 · answered by Deslok of Gammalon 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Morganie: basically one in all those you indexed is an educational magazine. the rest are all books! everybody with money and a writer can write a e book approximately regardless of they choose. the single and basically magazine you stated (the Italian "Quarterly evaluation of Biology") did not even communicate approximately clever layout. It basically reported that there seems to be a quantity organic and organic constants for which there's no clarification. an uncomplicated scientist leaves it at that and is going out in seek for the respond, they don't basically bull nonsense from their rear end and say "ok. that's the respond!". it is the priority with clever layout advocates. They grab any hollow in the scientific techniques and use the hollow itself to justify their place "Oh properly you spot! God could desire to've finished it!". that's high-quality to have confidence God "did" each and every thing. yet "God" is a ineffective end answer. It nonetheless does not clarify how such constants arose, or if there is any importance to them. to respond to the question: i don't comprehend of a unmarried peer reviewed educational magazine that explicitly endorses clever layout, and that i've got subscriptions to "Nature", and "Lancet" (scientific). additionally, i've got not considered a unmarried magazine at my college that has recommended such. they only do not exist simply by fact clever layout has been time and time lower back shown to by means of definition not be technological expertise.
2016-11-11 07:16:20 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why are they any faker than those set up by evolutionists to cite themselves without sounding like they're citing themselves?
2007-08-05 07:44:18 · answer #4 · answered by Deof Movestofca 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
There is no such list.
No such scientific journal exists.
And for good reason too.
2007-08-05 07:42:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋