Is anyone aware of a scientific attempt to proving Christianity?

Question

If so, could you please paste a link or give the name of the reference?

Answer 1

Hi Cusper, I just found this site within the past day but given the magnitude at which it parallels your question I thought I would go ahead and share. It is a site dedicated to what you are asking. In my brief experience with this site, I have found their science very helpful even if I have disagreed with some of their theology.

http://www.reasons.org/

Answer 2

Ummm. Not sure how relevant, but I am aware of a scientific attempt to prove the existence of God.

Look up 'Frank J Tipler' and the 'Omega Point Theory'

Hopefully this should provide you with some sort of helpful information.

If you are wondering about the difference, I'm getting at the fact that Christianity as a religion focuses on the Bible, not the existence of God.

Answer 3

I ask those who say it cannot be done to go get educated. Here are just a few links/books.

God: The Evidence
I Don't Have Enough Faith to be An Atheist
Not By Chance! - Shattering the Modern Theory of Evolution (well... you many not wish to read this one. Its technical, and it is more disproving the theory evolution than anything else)
tektonics.org
answersingenesis
The Case For Christ
Know Why You Believe
The Case for a Creator

I especially reccomend the websites and the second book... I hope this helps - I have read/looked at all these (except the evolution one) and have found most of them to be very good.

Answer 4

This typically is the domain of the archeological and historical sciences and it's been going on for quite some time.

BTW, there's nothing to be proven since the life of Christ is known fact. A lot of people do spend a lot of their time trying to disprove Christ but He just won't go away.
They tried killing Him but He came back from the dead.
They try calling Him a legend but the evidence otherwise is just too overwhelming.
So in the end they must just deny Him, and sadly, they will have to see Him in His Kingdom and here Him say "cast them into the outer darkness"

Answer 5

Your question is without logic,I regret to inform you. Science consists of physics - the domain of physical law and it's mutitudinous properties - whereas religion of any sort falls within the domain of metaphysics,an entirely different field. Studying any religion from the standpoint of physics would make about as much sense as assessing the value of a car by asking yourself how good of a person it is. Theology is based on metaphysics and has nothing to do with physical law. That's why atheists can't comprehend religiosity well enough to refute it. They think (for example) that if scripture describes heaven as "above" humanity,then this must refer to astrophysical position. Heaven would be in low-earth orbit. Actually,the indication is a spiritual condition or state of being. Assuming "above" should be interpreted in astrophysical terms makes as much sense as assuming if federal law establishes that the federal government is "above" state government,then the White House must be floating above your state capital building. Obviously,the term in that context refers to rank,not physical position. But the difference is far greater with respect to physics and metaphysics. You cannot cross-reference the two. There is no logic to it. You reveal a concept of reality that is crudely materialistic - basically analogous to the equally crude literalism with which fundamentalists "interpret" scripture. Oh yes - they really do think heaven is in LEO,or at least many of them.
Catholics don't.

Answer 6

I have seen reports on TV of many things found. Even Noah's Ark up in the top of the tallest mountain, build to the same measurements as the Bible says it was built to. And ones about Jesus too.
But to tell you where all the places you can find on the internet, my memory is not the perfect.

Answer 7

Well, archelogy , and historians are doing a damned amazing job at proving how far back christianity goes, they have many relics that bear "christian" symbols. I am fairly sure the group that called themselves christians are a confirmed fact. What they believed in... nope no studies that i know of .

Answer 8

sk8er punk girl needs to get off her mommy and daddy's AOL account and realize she is 13 and doesn't know anything about the world.

Same with Gorgious, who shows how ignorant she really is on the subject.

I think facts back up Christianity, like finding of artifacts, and the tomb that might have been Christ's tomb, I'm not sure whatever became of that. You don't have to believe in Christianity, but to attack it because you have nothing in your life is really sad.

Answer 9

It is not possible to prove Christianity. You would have to prove every single claim in the Bible to prove that the Bible is inerrant, a fundamental precept of Christianity.

Science does not concern itself with God or gods; they are, by nature, unmeasurable, as they cannot be perceived.

Answer 10

Those who have tried to prove the Bible right usually prove it wrong. Those who tried to use the distribution of species to track back to Noah's Ark discovered there is no center of distribution and that different classes of animals tend to be restricted by continent.