English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-05 03:17:11 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

19 answers

Jesus wasn't even real.

2007-08-05 03:19:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 6

No, as Jesus and Buddha were generally comtemporaries (if you're assuming the validity of both of them as historical realities - which there's much more evidence for Buddha than for Jesus).

However, some people theorize that Jesus studied in India, which would have had him studying the ancient Vedic religion, which at that time had become quite currupt - which is why Buddha created his reform tradition, and the religious entity we now call Hinduism also came from that reform period.

But really, if you study the teachings of all great holy men in any tradition, you will find that they all espouse the same basic path - which includes selfless service to mankind, compassion to all beings, etc.

2007-08-05 03:28:19 · answer #2 · answered by prana_devi 4 · 1 2

in accordance to the edicts of A?oka,in the 0.33 century BC emissaries have been despatched to diverse international locations west of India with a view to unfold Buddhism (Dharma), particularly in jap provinces of the neighboring Seleucid Empire, or maybe farther to Hellenistic kingdoms of the Mediterranean. This led, a century later, to the emergence of Greek-conversing Buddhist monarchs in the Indo-Greek Kingdom, and to the form of the Greco-Buddhist paintings of Gandh?ra. in this era Buddhism became uncovered to considered one of those impacts, from Persian and Greek civilization, and from changing tendencies in non-Buddhist Indian religions – themselves stimulated by utilising Buddhism. that's an argument of conflict of words between scholars no be counted if or no longer those emissaries have been observed by utilising Buddhist missionaries. whilst this makes it achieveable, that's inconceivable. as Yeshua (Jesus) became a Jew and an observantt Jew does no longer positioned yet another god till now his God. besides Yeshua became unfavourable. no longer something in the bible helps him having a appropriate coaching in Galileee. If Buddhism could have been taught it could have been in Jerusalem and Yeshua did no longer flow to college that a great way from his homestead..The donkey holiday could take days.

2016-10-09 06:25:26 · answer #3 · answered by eidemiller 4 · 0 0

I really doubt it. But in the "other side" what we call heaven, Jesus have probably knew what it is. We the human race is being reincarnated here on earth to experience life's challenges by choice from the "other side" b4 the soul inhabit a human body ready to be born. This will raise alot of questions, but thats how I see it, get the big picture! We are constantly bombarded by society, work, family commitments everyday to survive. Therefore we tend to forget to shut all else down and ask ourselves why we are really here. Meditation brings us closer to our guides and other beings to help us understand ourselves better.

2007-08-05 03:27:05 · answer #4 · answered by j 1 · 0 2

I have read that there is some historical evidence which seems to indicate Jesus may have been in India during the part of his Life which you don't find in the Bible. If true, it would be reasonable to believe he was probably exposed to the Beliefs of the time.

Could that be why that particular part of his Life was left out of the Bible?

2007-08-05 03:27:03 · answer #5 · answered by Champion of Knowledge 7 · 1 2

Even if he did, he seems to have utterly rejected it on the following subjects:
1) God as personal, rather than impersonal;
2) God as distinct from the world, rather than part of it (or the world as part of God);
3) God as knowable through revelation, rather than ineffable;
4) God as good, rather than beyond good and evil;
5) People are given spiritual life from God, rather than being innately divine; and,
6) The reality of hell, rather than enlightenment.

2007-08-05 07:39:53 · answer #6 · answered by Deof Movestofca 7 · 0 0

No, Buddhism came after Jesus so I would say they copied his statements of love.

2007-08-05 03:26:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Buddha is indeed the Enlighten One. Indeed a bless One. A great teacher. A man of compassion.

Study his teaching. Meditate on it. Understand his Wisdom. And it will lead you to the truth and light and salvation.

So to put it , Buddha study Jesus and not as you ask.

Buddhist, please do not be offended. Meditate on my answer and if you found me to be ignorant please bare with my stupidity.

2007-08-05 03:38:38 · answer #8 · answered by Kingdomchild07 5 · 0 1

If he was real and he was religiously well versed then it would be safe to assume not only Buddhism but many known religions of his time, though in practice he was Jewish.

2007-08-05 03:22:50 · answer #9 · answered by Amber F 4 · 2 3

No, he studied Judaism stuff in old musty scrolls, and likely he was bored out of his mind.
Then later got the brilliant idea of preaching and saying exciting things.

2007-08-05 03:24:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Unlikely in the extreme

2007-08-05 03:21:24 · answer #11 · answered by Jack P 7 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers