I love this question.
If Christians wouldnt believe it now-a-days, do you think people believed it back in the time of Jesus? Probably not..
So why can't Christians accept non-believers now-a-days, if people, no doubt, didn't believe in it back then? Religion is a huge problem in the world. These kinds of questions should be brought to the attention of world leaders and society.
Christians who are answering to this right off their heads, "NO!" would probably think the same if they were alive during the time of Jesus Christ, so I think people with other religions and beliefs should be more understanding of each other. World peace is an issue :(
2007-08-05 00:06:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Seeblob 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think there is any reason to believe it. Why should a christian believe it? I would certainly believe that she may still be a virgin, but the god bit, no.
There's actually a lot of ignorance in your question, and i think the only reason i've answered several of your uneducated questions today is that i'm bored and you're setting yourself up as an easy target.
You seem to be determined to crush christians view points today and i am wondering just exactly why.
Trying learning a bit about what you're talking about before starting your hate campaign, otherwise just let christians be.They have that right.
2007-08-05 03:40:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd believe the pregnancy but not who the father is part. Virgins getting pregnant with intact hymem is not that rare of an occurence.
C'mon you guys should know this , it's 10th grade biology. If they didn't teach you this in school then I want my tax dollars back that paid for your education
2007-08-05 00:07:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Looking at the answers here, I wonder if some people actually know what the hymen is! Even with artificial insemnation, the hymen would be broken.
Also, how do you think Jesus is going to return for his 2nd coming? Maybe God has chosen to repeat himself!
2007-08-05 00:03:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Grotty Bodkin is not dead!!! 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Of course not.
There are many more things to consider; like blood lines and prophesies if she is going to claim to be the mother of the messiah.
Also, the messiah had to be born a certain number of years after a certain event.
2007-08-05 00:16:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by CJohn317 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It quite possible, and not unheard-of, for women to become pregnant without penetrational sex. All it takes is for the necessary fluids to get into the approximate area.
Those little guys can swim, and an extra inch or two is well within their range.
CD
@Actually, Ashley - the other way round, please!
2007-08-05 00:01:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Super Atheist 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'll tell you when it's on the evening news. Most likely, it will involve me asking how these doctors got a degree.
Pat Robertson would have a field day with that one lol...
2007-08-05 00:04:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by psych_radish 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course not. I'm not that gullible.
Once you know what it takes to become pregnant, you have to be gullible, stupid, delusional or the father to want to believe that lie.
2007-08-05 00:02:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Seeker 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
God already has his son. She is not pregnant with Gods child.
2007-08-05 00:15:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Not because I don't believe it's possible, but because we have already had Jesus Christ come to Earth. Why would we need another Jesus?
2007-08-04 23:59:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋