300 Spartans VS. 300 Vikings??

Question

Well i saw 300 in theaters, and I was very satisfied with the movie. And i just finished watching Pathfinder which I though was a very poor movie. The acting was horrible, and the story was cheesy. The only cool thing was the Vikings. To me they seemed pretty bad ***. But I still think Spartans could murder them. SO what do u all think?

Answer 1

The Spartans would wipe them out. The Vikings were marauders. Hit and run tactics were their specialty. Spartans were taught to fight from the age of 2. Their whole life was based around warfare and combat. The Vikings would raid a defenseless village and rape and murder. The Vikings were hard men no doubt but I would liken it to a big hard b***ard in a bar meeting an off-duty special forces soldier. No contest.

Answer 2

One on one the Vikings would prevail. Spartans don't fight that way and 300 berserkers charging into the Spartans would probably lose. The vikings did have much superior metal than the bronze spears and swords of the Spartans. They might have been able to cut right through their defense with the huge Iron swords. They also had chain mail and very good padding underneath. It is possible that might make a huge difference.

Answer 3

the Spartans would win due to fact there is strength in numbers. The Spartans were a well oiled disciplined fighting force that fought as a single unit, that cohesion among the Spartan ranks would have carried the day against the Viking hordes.

Answer 4

The 300 Spartans were defending their own land against the invading Persians. The Vikings were essentially commerce raiders. But, during World War Two in Europe, France fell in just over one month to the invading Germans, even though France had a large and well-equipped army. It took the Germans 69 days to defeat and occupy Norway, where the descendants of the Vikings lived. And Norwegian resistance would have been even longer, had Vitar Quisling and the other pro-Nazis not collaborated with the Nazis. Even then, the Germans had to commit one million men of the Wehrmacht to hold down those seven million Norwegians.

Answer 5

Easy answer.

Spartans used bronze weapons.

Vikings used iron weapons.

Iron weapons beat bronze weapons everytime.

If you remember your history:

Macedon defeated ther Spartans

Romans defeated Macedon

Gauls defeated Rome.

Vikings were 7th thry 11th century.

Spartans were 300 BC.

It would be like the current US Army fighting the Napoleon Army.

Answer 6

Spartans would probably prevail.... if they were in the phalanx formation the VIkings would probably get slaughtered...

Answer 7

I agree because the vikings didnt take on nearly as much of a force.

Answer 8

Minnesota can't even make the playoffs, so my vote goes to the Spartans.

Answer 9

I think I'll have to go with the discipline and tactics of the Spartans to win.

Answer 10

SPARTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!

lol =)