Scientists can create life from life? Scientists are unable to create new life. How do you create new life?

Answer 1

What is required for life?

The dictionary says: metabolism, reproduction, growth, and adaptation.

Robots are capable of all of that today. They metabolize electricity, reproduce in robotic assembly plants, grow through the integration of upgraded parts, and adapt their behavior through the use of artificial intelligence.

The only reason humans deny that robots, machines, and computers are alive is that humans arrogantly believe that all life has to be just like them.

It doesn't.

Answer 2

The commencing place of existence often takes a 'opposite' reductionist innovations-set, so a strategies as i'm conscious (disclaimer - i'm a neuroscientist, so i'm no longer as familiar with the main perplexing info of the commencing up of existence as, say, an evolutionary biologist, yet I do have some preparation in evolutionary biology ): a million) Small organic and organic molecules, created by ability of chemical reactions from the Earth's risky early environment and events interior the sea, formed amino acids. 2) those amino acids formed RNA. 3) this easy genetic code, blended with different organic and organic molecules which formed a small cellular membrane and cytoplasm, became the muse for protocells. 4) Protocells, by the variations of their RNA, became the worldwide' first micro organism, coming up a extra complicated cellular membrane and an indoors corresponding to that of archaebacteria. 5) micro organism conglomerated into small communities for survival purposes; those became the worldwide's first eukaryotic cells. 6) Cells began to clump mutually, for survival, and became the worldwide's first multicellular organisms .

Answer 3

There's only 2 ways I know of to create new life: having sex to create a baby and planting seeds that germinate and grow in the ground.

The latter isn't a great example, as seeds are already "living things" that are awakened, for want of a better way of explaining it.

Test tube babies, in vitro fertilization, etc. are all variations of the same theme: the fertilization of an egg.

Answer 4

Scientists have created a virus from scratch. That's close. They've also managed to generate many (12 of 20) of the amino acids required for enzymes all from various lab experiments. The most difficult thing about trying to animate non-living matter is to recreate the conditions of the early Earth (which science is constantly updating).

Answer 5

You know what... it took nature 500 million years to form a molecule that could replicate itself.... our scientist have only been at it for about 50 years. I believe that if given the time, scientist will be able to create life in a test tube...

.. and then what?

Answer 6

The law of conservation of mass. Energy can be neither created nor destroyed only redirected. According to science new life is not something that can be accomplished.

Added: I re-read my answer and it sounds as if it could be misinterpreted, what I meant to say is you cant create something from nothing. Simple scientific fact.

Answer 7

I thought your parents were supposed to explain this to you, but here goes. When a man and a woman really love each other they like to lay down in bed together, then the man inserts his wangdoodle in the womans pantry and nine months later is the miracle of life.

I feel semi retarded now.

Answer 8

Let me tell you a little secret love...
A man and a woman who Love each other very much get together, make beautiful love, one thing leads to another and 9 months later a baby is born. The human body is a wondrous and miraculous thing.

Answer 9

oh for peats sake people should stop playing God. Only God can create a new life, not people! No matter how close they get, they won't be able to create a new life, humans, animals, etc. Only God can!

Answer 10

viruses have been synthesised from scratch:

http://www.sunysb.edu/research/milestones1/page4/page4.html

viruses are arguably not alive - although they can replicate and evolve, they don't have complex metabolism. some degree of complexity is required to be able to say 'life has been created', but what's the bet that when that happens, "skeptics" such as yourself will move the goalposts again?

vitalism is dead, get over it.