And, if so, would that officially be Hell on Earth?
2007-08-04 08:21:52 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Oops, "If Mitt..."
2007-08-04 08:24:33 · update #1
gx temptress: They put parking meters south of Durango!?
I lived just North of Durango, above that tattoo parlor and rental car place at St Mary's and Durango. My racket was parking one block south, where there were no meters.
2007-08-04 08:27:24 · update #2
What about birth control?
Yes, Mitt would give us a USA that is hell on earth.
I toasted to you at Rosarios. Ask my friend Marsha. I got a damn parking ticket too.
2007-08-04 08:25:47 · answer #1 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
A 2nd headline in yet a distinctive paper: militia forces (without order) enter the cities of great apple, l. a., Denver and Chicago to help Police in controlling roving bands of looters interior the wake of yesterdays Presidential election. Sub headline: Hospitals overwhelmed via fallen looters-Blood donors desperately mandatory. on the Radio: In at present's suited thoughts: militia forces dependable to the form have placed down the unrest in numerous the international locations greatest cities. The police and Elected officers grateful. it could and selection properly would take place. Have a useful day.
2016-10-13 23:20:35 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a thought... well prohibition did NOT work in the 1920s so I doubt it would be the first order of business.
Another thought is... Will we all have to wear the 'special' underwear with the magic symbols on it to protect ourselves from evil.
Yea all of us running around with magic longjohns is more likely than prohibition. Starbucks would fight that. Mormons don't drink coffee.
2007-08-04 08:24:36 · answer #3 · answered by ??IMAGINE ?? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Each State determines it's own rules. There are a dozen states more restrictive than Utah.
2007-08-04 11:22:25 · answer #4 · answered by Isolde 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he didn't try to change Massachusetts law regarding alcohol when he was there and if he tried you know Ted Kennedy would lead the charge to override him anyways.
2007-08-04 08:25:17 · answer #5 · answered by genaddt 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No, the states control the liquor laws. So don't worry.
2007-08-04 08:24:18 · answer #6 · answered by Joel 2 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The president doesnt rule america, the congress does.
2007-08-04 08:25:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Congress passes laws, didn't you ever see Schoolhouse Rock?
2007-08-04 08:26:46 · answer #8 · answered by Sean M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully the next president will do away with liquor altogether
2007-08-04 08:26:52 · answer #9 · answered by Nunya 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
1) as gov of mass he didn't change it
2) congress if the force, he could ony veto
2007-08-04 08:28:07 · answer #10 · answered by Marysia 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋