Fat tissue is approximately 20% less dense than muscle, so it takes up 20% more space. Muscle burns 19 times more calories than fat.
So a pound of muscle takes less space and burns more calories then a pound of fat. Build muscle, lose fat!
2007-08-04 07:14:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by dasher mage1 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fat is bulky and lumpy so if you carry an extra five pounds of fat, you'll be lumpier than with five pounds more muscle. A five pound pile of fat will take up more space (volume) than a five pound pile of muscle; but five pounds is still five pounds, so for those of you that don't "get" English, you cannot say one thing weighing a certain weight weighs more than another thing at that same weight. It's a common joke to play on an 8-year old. The correct way to state the muscle weighs more than fat scenario is, "Muscle is heavier by volume than fat."
A woman weighing 150 pounds with 19% fat will look much smaller (and be much healthier) than a woman at 150 pounds with 35% fat. They weigh the same, yet the composition is different. Because muscle is more dense than fat the person with less fat and more muscle will look smaller.
2007-08-04 14:16:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by If u were wondering, It's me 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Muscle.
2007-08-12 10:53:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Simmi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Muscle.
2007-08-04 14:13:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by pureevilpopstar 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Muscle of course
2007-08-12 13:03:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by all about me 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
a pound of muscle weighs the same as a pound of fat. However, muscle is more dense so it takes up less space. think of what a pound of potatos looks like compared to a pound of lettuce
2007-08-04 15:30:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by HockeyGirl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
muscle
2007-08-12 10:47:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by gummy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
muscle
2007-08-12 10:35:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Muscle is denser that fat-it takes up less room.
2007-08-04 15:43:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by bonnieh1964 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
muscle
2007-08-04 14:20:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by dowski 2
·
0⤊
0⤋