rawk!
2007-08-04 04:39:51 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes, why can't I have one of those eggs?
2007-08-04 05:04:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The two aren't mutually exclusive, but they're not synonymous either. The phrase means "to risk losing everything by putting all your efforts or all your money into one plan or one course of action". This could be due to selfishness, but not necessarily.
2007-08-04 11:51:41 · answer #2 · answered by Deof Movestofca 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is an exception for every rule, and the exceptional are often free from the rules. Because they rule themselves.
Don't judge motives, judges results. "wherefore by their fruits, shall you know them".
2007-08-04 11:49:22 · answer #3 · answered by THEHATEDTRUTH 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, not selfish, just foolish. Don't count 'em before they hatch. And the correct word is "PAWK" Hee hee.
2007-08-04 11:49:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its the only sensible strategy for th chicken.
2007-08-04 11:43:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, that's stupid, because if you drop the basket you're gonna loose all of them!
2007-08-04 11:42:45 · answer #6 · answered by sea link2 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not selfish....just stupid. If all your hopes are pinned on just one thing and it doesn't work out, then what?
2007-08-04 11:43:14 · answer #7 · answered by Blue Oyster Kel 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not if they are all good eggs!
2007-08-04 12:02:55 · answer #8 · answered by WillRogerswannabe 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on how many you have.
2007-08-04 11:43:37 · answer #9 · answered by Fish <>< 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really
2007-08-04 11:43:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋