sunjay dutt case is not innocent case it is tada so it is necessary for jail to learn the lesson?

Answer 1

what are u talking about it is neccessary fot jail to learn lesson.
how can u or sanjay dutt teach lesson to jail. please, please. please dont murder english language. learn the language first and then use it.

Answer 2

You are asking the same question in different formats !
Sanjay Dutt was convicted u/Arms Act not TADA. He is sentenced to 6 yrs RI.
Mr Madhukar Satpotdar, Shiv Sainik and former MP was caught red handed by the army with multiple weapons in his car in a TADA notified area, during the Mumbai riots which preceded the blasts. Curiously Satpotdar was "acquitted" of all charges i.e. he got away scot free whereas Sanjay and several other blasts convicts are awarded exemplary punishment for the same offences.
The prosecution against Bal Thackeray for his role in the riots has been conveniently "forgotten". Ditto LK Advani for his role in the Babri Masjid incident. Ditto the main culprits of the Gujarat riots. Ditto the main culprits in the Sikh riots.
What lesson is to be learnt?
Different justice for different people. India Shining. Jai Hind.

Answer 3

devote the Crime - Do the Time. Sanjay is fortunate that he replaced into basically sentenced u/palms Act and not below TADA like many different Accused interior the case who looked as though it might have committed comparable offences. choose Kode has indulged Sanjay interior the difficulty of submit conviction bail, as additionally at present whilst he authorized him privileges no longer accorded to the different convicts. Sanjay like others has to stand the implications of his strikes. Had Sanjay been accorded any preferential therapy, it might have been a sparkling violation of paintings.14 for the different convicts, a number of whom have have been given unduly harsh sentences. the well-known public feels sorry for Sanjay because of the fact of his Munnabhai character, however the reality is that he would not deserve preferential therapy in basic terms by way of this. on the top of the day, justice could be seemed to be finished. at present's teenagers are a breed aside who's probably no longer somewhat vulnerable to be taught any classes from the end results of this or different situations. an outstanding message could be despatched out if those named via the Justice Srikrishna fee interior the Bombay riots situations are additionally prosecuted, albeit belatedly.

Answer 4

Being a part of the legal profession it will be wrong on my part to give any assessment about the conviction or sentence of Sunjay Dutt for these reasons, firstly the I have not seen all the evidence that was brought against him by the CBI in the TADA court on the basis of which the said court held him guilty under section 26 (2) of the Arms Act but found him innocent under the provisions of TADA. Secondly I will not comment how the Hon'ble Supreme Court will assess the evidence & the circumstance of his case when they go through his Bail application as well appeal against the TADA court for his conviction itself & sentence thereof. Third point which any one here & in other questions regarding this issue including my own question on this very issue asked few days back failed to bring out is that why every one is forgetting that that prosecution will also be going for appeal against the order of TADA court where he was set free on the charges under the TADA itself & was found guilty only under the Arms Act. It has been pointed that his was a borderline case as far as TADA charges are concerned which the Hon'ble Judge of the TADA court had given him benefit & acquitted him on those charges. One thing which I want to point out here about the similar cases which gsham ji has mentioned in his reply, in criminal cases the conviction of any accused is based on the evidence produced against him by the prosecution & the circumstances of the case, if any court acquitted some one in the similar case must be because the prosecution evidence or the circumstance of the case may not be so strong to convict that person, its not the fault of the judge but weakness of the prosecution that has to be blamed, if the prosecution is not preparing their case properly as required in their charge sheet then no one can do anything for such cases, here lies their weakness or political pressure on the law enforcement agencies who are engaged in the criminal cases as prosecution. Some one pointed about the Media publicity to this case or such cases, whatever may be the case the Supreme Court is least bothered about all such media coverage or publicity & even the public opinion (because what general public say in open is based on what they listen, see or read in media & not the evidence which is placed on the records against the accused). So my dear friends lets wait & see how our Hon'ble Supreme Court decide this matter when it come up before it, after they finally decide this matter then you all are free to pass your comments, so save these for that time.

Answer 5

Courts mainly decide cases based on evidence provided by the prosecution, arguments by the lawyers of both the sides and the LAW of the land.

Answer 6

he should have got at least 15 years behind bars.

Answer 7

yes