"The idea that there is no God is mathematically impossible."
Bzzt. Didn't take you long to screw that up, did it?
You read a creationist propaganda site that presented a silly children's argument - one that argued for what you already believed to be true. Because it didn't challenge your beliefs, you chose to ignore the rather obvious giant flaws in reasoning, the invalid appeal to authority (oh, and if you really thought you had a mathematical proof, why did you need to appeal to authority in the middle of it?), and the false assumptions about evolution (evolution is not mere chance).
You were lied to, you bought the lie, and ran right over here to repost it. You're in WAY over your head here - I strongly suggest that you go work on something simpler. There's a reason why scientists don't agree with you, and it's because they're well-informed, and you're not.
2007-08-04 03:45:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Well, think about this. It IS possible. You say it's a statistical impossibility. What if this statistic were multiplied by infinity. All of a sudden it happens. It happens an infinite number of times. SO it may not happened on other planets. So far we're the only known living things in the galaxy, but the universe is infinite, and we aren't the starting point. We're just another number on a graph when it comes down to it.
FYI though, I do think evolution is bullcrap. Most of it is so psychotic and out there that it wouldn't EVER happen. I'm just saying, statistical impossibilities can happen in an infinite universe.
2007-08-04 13:32:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mozer 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
bwaaaahahahaha the tornado in a junk yard is an analogy that has nothing to do with evolution. Your "proof" is flawed.
Evolution does not state that man arrive fully formed on the scene. To be correct, your analogy would have to include very simple beginnings and the "cadillac" would also have to be able to replicate itself, creating a little cadillac that was slightly different from its parents.
You have successfully attacked the straw man you have created and at the same time made a laughing stock out of yourself, Don Quixote.
2007-08-04 10:46:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
if i were to use just the info available in your question, then the only conclusion that can be draw is that evolution is statistically impossible. you have not proven the existence of God. the question of how we got here is not one of multiple choice with only two choices. it's a multiple choice with theoretically infinite choices. so, you have, at best, made one of the choices seem improbable. How does that prove the existence of God?
the only way your answer would make sense is if evolution was the opposite of god and we had only those two options; that way, you can prove one by disproving the other.
and you did not mathematically arrive at that proof. mathematically proving god would be to mathematically prove god. by hopthesizing that evolution is statistically impossible, does not mean that you have proven the existence of god with mathematics.
i bet you got like a 1050 on your SATs.
a small mind and a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.
2007-08-04 10:40:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Everything around me is a proof,
The whole world didn't come about by chance, IMPOSSIIBLE
There was design in the explosion, in the big bang
1) God is One and Only
2) God is Eternal Absolute
3) God begets not, nor is He begotten
4) There is none comparable to Him.
Peace
Proud Muslim
2007-08-05 09:55:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nourhan 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not saying that god doesn't exist, I'm just saying he is not necessary. And by the way if your argument is that nothing can come into existence naturally, or that its improbable, then what created god? Is it probable that god just formed out of nothingness? If so, then why can't the same be said about the rest of the universe? Either god and the universe can come into existence naturally, or everything has a creator including your god. Take your pick but you can't have both.
2007-08-04 10:41:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Yeah, I got a comment... You need to educate yourself about the Theory of Evolution before you go spouting off making yourself look like an idiot. Your mathematicians "examples" are bogus arguments that don't stand up. Scientist know that, given the conditions on the early earth, the probability of life NOT spontaneously forming was ridiculous.
Get thee to a college biology class and rid thee of thy ridiculous creation theories.
2007-08-04 10:45:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
There are certain things that mathematics also cannot answer. For better understanding, I'd recommend you to read " God Created Integers " by Stephen Hawkings.
2007-08-04 10:38:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Der23 1
·
4⤊
1⤋
Yes, and I have found out a bit more proof.
Eveloutian has been proved, and like he said, it is impossible to build a human out of a blob of mud.
And if the Vigirn Mary was really a Virgin, how did the baby get into her womb? It's not like somebody can magically zap a baby into people's wombs. She must have had sexual intercourse or something of that sort, because it is impossbile to have a baby otherwise, unless she was adopting the baby.
And I don't mean to be offense to any people that believe in God, but this is what I have found.
2007-08-04 10:35:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Emily J 6
·
4⤊
4⤋
First of all who said that all people who don't believe in god said evolution was the answer???
2007-08-04 10:43:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋