English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why don't we use the existing interstate system corridors to install a highspeed rail system that is capable of receiving and discharging auto's and trucks on the move. The savings in gas, wear and tear, and the reduction in pollution would be tremendous.

2007-08-03 19:36:55 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Cars & Transportation Commuting

To clarify: this rail system would use the existing corridors and would be fluid in movement. There would be no stopping of the train. Hydraulics would place the vehicle on and off the train at a steady 65 mph, at the drivers wish. The technology is there to do this.

2007-08-03 22:24:58 · update #1

6 answers

Not practical.

2007-08-11 05:56:30 · answer #1 · answered by Old Man 7 · 0 0

I say a rail device would be extra suitable that the Interstate street device using fact using fact the extra each and every person is taking to the roads our street platforms is getting crowded. I appeared at how some international locations have severe-velocity rail platforms, years earlier than the united states, whilst our national rail community comprise a countrywide intercity rail service and freight rail service, the two considered one of that would desire to share the comparable suitable of way. Then there is the environmental concern and our dependence on the "black stuff". i think its time that we, as a rustic, pull up our sleeves and initiate putting our national rail device back mutually. shall we save on with the example of eastern and Europeans, who have already got electrified severe-velocity rail working on it very own suitable of way at speeds that makes our national rail device appear as if a crosstown bus. shall we instruct the worldwide, that this u . s . a ., does no longer might desire to trusted imported "black gold" from over seas and supply the airways slightly a contest. shall we tell our elected officers that a extra suitable rail community is mandatory and mandatory now, no longer later. So, yeah, the US could have been extra suitable off with a rail platforms somewhat than an Interstate street device and immediately, this u . s . a . might desire to nonetheless have a extra suitable rail device from what we at the instant have.

2016-10-09 04:43:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your forgetting about one little thing that makes America great.. Freedom.. What if I wanted to stop the train so I could check out that cool 'mom-n-pop' restaurant?

And what if a terrorist got control of the system?

Look up a radio program called x minus 1. They had an episode that dealt with this proposition and it went terribly wrong.

2007-08-03 19:48:57 · answer #3 · answered by noobienoob2000 4 · 0 0

loading and unloading takes forever--the auto train to Florida is an 8 hour load and an 8 hour unload time--I could walk to Florida in 16 hours

2007-08-03 19:42:27 · answer #4 · answered by fire_inur_eyes 7 · 2 0

Because the cost will be enormous and if you are to stupid to drive safely then stay off the road.

2007-08-03 19:51:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You see how well AMTRAK functions now!!

2007-08-03 19:45:18 · answer #6 · answered by Wounded Duck 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers