For Jehovah's Witnesses...what theology do you find the most difficult to refute?

Question

Is there a particularly difficult "nut to crack" in the door-to-door world? Roman Catholic? Baptist? Calvinist backgrounds? Others?

Answer 1

howdy. gramps here.

none are 'hard' if they have a bible, any language, any version, and can read and reason fully from the scriptures.
unlike the individual calling himself 'christian soldier', who has no biblical background and apparently very few resources other than to mimic unhappy sinners.

apostates would be the most difficult to reach, as they have their minds blinded by satan. they are by and large persons who were caught in some unrepentant deed and are trying to justify themselves in some fashion.

next might be the 'non-holy book' based religions, such as wicca, demon worship, satanism, anamism and ancestor worship. the reason there is they all have their own flavour
or an individual micro-belief. no unanimity or conformity to anything or anyone.

next might be the religions based on nonbible books: mohammadanism, bhuddism, hinduism, bahai and the like.

next would be those religions that have a book lightly based on the bible. these would be the mormons, ro caths [their own missals and catechisms], protestant groups who are part & parcel of a larger 'main organization' such as baptists, lutherans, methodists, episcopal/ anglican, and pentecostal based religions.

the aforementioned fellow who just rants and had not even answered the question - i would LOVE to debate him, but he would refuse from abject fear - are the easiest to refute as they just LOVE to cite one verse out of context and base their entire dogma on that single dictum. they are always angry, never reflect the love of jehovah the heavenly father, or the christ, his anointed son, or even the good samaritan.

anger and hate just do not work. nor does raising your voice and banging a bible on a desk or rostrum or car to make a point. like the guys on tv.

and the offer to debate, point by point, civilly, of course, is open to the fellow 'chrstn soldier'. let's see how well armed he is!

if the readers here want to see some interesting dialogue, drop him a note and see if he can stand the heat.

adios from the beach

grandpa len

Answer 2

sure, Jehovah's Witnesses have self belief in a real resurrection. No, people who killed Jesus can not kill Michael the Archangel. The vulnerable guy Jesus born of a human laid his existence down...what arose on the third day replaced right into a effective spirit able to stroll by good wall and alter his constructive properties. He materialized a fleshly physique so his disciples would desire to ascertain him. incorrect, Jesus replaced into raised from the ineffective back to existence. notwithstanding he replaced into raised back to the style he had earlier he got here to earth...a spirit. tell me do you have self belief Christians who're "born back" while they die they're raised interior the comparable physique they died in...a human physique? No. in the event that they have been we would have considered them ascending into heaven yet no person has ever considered every person ascending into heaven. they're given a non secular physique this is invisible to human eyes upon resurrection. in basic terms spirits stay in heaven...to stay in heaven they'd desire to be spirits so as that they are given a clean physique...a non secular one. the certainty that they have got a diverse physique does no longer mean they are no longer the comparable individual. Flesh and blood can not enter or stay in heaven. What take place to Jesus fleshly physique...Jehovah bumped off it..probably disintegrating it into the atoms from which it replaced into formed. We have self belief people who're to be resurrected back to the earth would be resurrected the way Lazarus replaced into resurrected with a human physique corresponding to the single they died in by using fact that one decomposed into the floor We have self belief people who're to be resurrected and ascend into the heavens is truthfully no longer resurrected the way Lazarus replaced into..their resurrection would be corresponding to Jesus' in basic terms they gained't would desire to materialized a fleshly physique so as that all of us comprehend that they have got been resurrected. Jesus had to, or there would be persevered doubt that he replaced into raised from the ineffective. No guy is familiar with the day nor the hour...that's certainty. No guy has ever considered God...that too is certainty. something is a lie i'm a Jehovah's Witness

Answer 3

The worst 'nut' to crack would be the atheists. But then they don't or wouldn't have any type of christian theology. Any of them could be tuff, the athiests are the worst though.

Answer 4

Seems to me that Jehovah's Witnesses and many other religions of this sort, start by finding contradictions between the Bible and the Catholic church.

Answer 5

It's not the religions, but the people. There are people from every walk of life in our organization, all races, all peoples, all tongues, from every nation on the earth, and they have come out of every type of religion as well. It's all about heart condition, pride is stubborn, humbling yourself before the true God is the only way.

Answer 6

None of the religions are hard to crack, but Buddhism gives some very helpful guidelines and practices for living.

Answer 7

This is fun.....THEMOM says..."No one group... just anyone who already has their minds made up to not hear me out. I dislike closemindedness, and that comes in all shapes, sizes, ethnic groups and religions"



I ask, have you ever tried to share the Gospel with a closed minded witness....



http://towerwatch.com

Answer 8

No one group... just anyone who already has their minds made up to not hear me out. I dislike closemindedness, and that comes in all shapes, sizes, ethnic groups and religions.

Answer 9

Native American for me

Answer 10

Apathy! The "I don't care" attitude.