Just for fun since Bourne Ultimatum came out today....Who do you think would win a fight between Jason Bourne or James Bond(Daniel Craig Casino Royale the new series seemed more Bourne-ish)?
In hand to hand combat(no weapons)
Using improvised weapons
And finally using firearms
2007-08-03 11:46:41 · 11 answers · asked by Cnote 6 in Sports ➔ Martial Arts
I've taken to answering questions like these with "Chuck Norris," always citing http://www.chucknorrisfacts.com/ as my source.
However, I shall make an exception to this one question, as I liked the Bourne Identity (haven't seen the other Bourne movies yet).
Jason Bourne would win, hands-down. Compared to him, James Bond is a powder-puff.
Yes, in hand-to-hand, improvised weapons (I mean, Bourne stabbed a guy with a pen), and with firearms.
2007-08-03 12:07:27 · answer #1 · answered by ATWolf 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Jason Bourne.
2007-08-05 06:33:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Jason Bourne. Like others said, Bourne is a well trained assassin...killing is what he does best. Bond is a spy, who has been trained VERY well in how to defend himself or take out someone if needed...but killing is not his main job.
2007-08-10 13:38:23 · answer #3 · answered by MDBeeman 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bourne.
2007-08-10 08:06:22 · answer #4 · answered by Doug 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry to say the little rich kid would win (Matt Damon I mean)..Ooops- I mean Jason Borne - I mean Michael Kane - I mean David Wells --Oh forget it already -----I know for dang sure NO Bond is winning anything more than a catfight!! Now what a minute - Ol' Sean Connery might ---hmmm
Oh and this guy don't need no stinking gun - and improvised weapons and hand to hand - I didn't see his name on the list but even deceased [may he rest in peace] BRUCE LEE -could stomp mudholes in anyone -
2007-08-11 01:37:59 · answer #5 · answered by L 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cheesa! Meesa! Nyahahaha! If you've read the book you'd laugh too : P But if you compare their lives and training, Bourne has the advantage. Although Bond has a license to kill, he was trained for espionage and seems to spend more time going after women than the bad guys, and like Frank the Tank said, he relies on gadgets way too much to get him out of a pickle. Bourne on the other hand relies more on his quick wits and instincts and was trained specifically for assasination and survival.
But of course, in real life, Daniel Craig could whoop Matt Damon's butt anytime.
2007-08-03 23:43:03 · answer #6 · answered by Shienaran 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bourne hands down, Bond is too much like Batman!!
2007-08-05 02:40:23 · answer #7 · answered by B 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bond relies too much on gadgets, yes, he has training, but Bourne is younger, and seems with more hand-to-hand experience.
2007-08-03 18:48:13 · answer #8 · answered by Frank the tank 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Pillsbury Dough Boy
2016-05-17 10:59:38 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm going to go with James bourne on this one, hes quicker with his hands and can execute his techniques faster and more fluidly.
2007-08-11 09:18:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋