nobody knows for sure and bush & his cronies don't care.
2007-08-03 10:38:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Assuming you actually consider the Iraqi invasion and current occupation to be part of the war on terror...
Most reports estimate between 500,000 and 800,000 killed, and between 2 million and 4 million displaced and homeless.
Confirmed civilians killed is estimated at 70,000 to 75,000 -- the remaining are considered "insurgents" and not civilians.
2007-08-03 10:43:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
earlier it exceeded over ability to the Iraqis, the CPA and distinctive human rights agencies worked at the same time to attempt to place at the same time some style of estimate of ways a lot of human beings had died violently on the palms of the progressive look after, the Iraqi police and others on the command and/or behest of the Saddam government. They got here up with a quantity between one hundred,000 and 250,000 over a era of two many years. a number of this became consistent with actual info (mass graves) yet maximum on anecdotal info simply by fact many professional information have been looted or destroyed presently after the U. S. invasion. The ineffective can't let us know something, so there is largely frustrating info and information to place self assurance in. If neither info nor information survives, then you could basically place self assurance in the word of residing witnesses. And, with all due appreciate to any residing witness of the varieties of atrocities Saddam devoted against the Iraqi human beings, they at the instant are not very stable once you're attempting to get a cope with on the quantity of the genocide. conflict could desire to be considered in a distinctive way than government-sanctioned mass homicide. that's conceivable that extra Iraqi civilians have died violently simply by fact the U. S. invasion than below 2 many years of Saddam's terror, yet unbelievable. that's envisioned that a pair thousand a minimum of died in US bomb assaults, then after a quick lull the Sunni insurgency began killing on elementary 60 to 70 an afternoon, and since the bombing of the mosque at Samarra and the counter-insurgency by means of Shia militias, the quantity has bigger somewhat. Do the maths. 1400 days of non-stop killing; elementary of, say, 70 civilians an afternoon in distinctive areas of the country - that's very nearly one hundred,000 civilian deaths in a 4 3 hundred and sixty 5 days era. Over 2 many years, that is 0.5 a million ineffective. yet I reiterate - it is conflict. conflict continually creates severe casualty numbers. something which you will locate of activity is the envisioned dying toll subsequently of sanctions imposed on Iraq after the Gulf conflict - 2 million civilians, lots of them if not maximum of them toddlers - died of hunger and ailment in 10 years. If conflict is Hell, then what are sanctions? playstation : you additionally must bear in mind that regardless of Saddam did after 1992, he could basically do it in choose areas of the country, simply by fact the south and the Kurdish sector have been the two secure by means of US and uk overflights.
2016-11-11 03:35:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Terrorists themselves have killed the majority of the citizens, they would have a more accurate number.
2007-08-03 18:51:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by erehwon 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no way to know for sure.....at least 30,000. It's safe to say that we've killed far more Iraqi civilians in 5 years than Saddam did in 30 years.
2007-08-03 10:39:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
#1 Who cares.
#2 Very, very few are dieing at the hands of American service members. It really should be telling that the people of Iraq are finally starting to stand up and take some responsibility for themselves, and they've picked the side of the interim government. That is our first step out of Iraq.
2007-08-03 10:57:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Douglas R 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
You mean those killed by there fellow countrymen because they dare oppose Saddam Hussein's rule or the reign of Hussein himself where many were killed for defying his tyranny.
2007-08-03 10:40:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Greg 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
A lot - 10's of thousands ? I'm surprised there's anyone left to blow up actually.
2007-08-03 10:40:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dr Watson (UK) 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
way too many
Douglas R - your #1 is why Osama and his buddies came here in the first place.
2007-08-03 11:22:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Al qaida is not keeping track as they kill more than any one else.
The Democrats have the next highest kill ratio by tying our military hands and having to ask " are you our enemy"?
2007-08-03 10:40:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
wow why would you ask such a thing it doesn't matter to anyone. we are too detached from this stuff. only if we had experienced such a thing would we be able to empathize
2007-08-03 10:41:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋