I was listening to the radio and heard a few callers call in about this. What's the deal?
2007-08-03 09:28:08 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Oh it was an executive order about protests in IRAQ? or what? We make their laws now?
2007-08-03 09:40:22 · update #1
I havent heard that recently, but a few weeks ago i did hear/ read a news article(russian) that was talking about Bush receiving a new executive power that would allow him to ban protests and freeze accounts of those who are not supporting the wars. It also gave him enough power to give off the impression that he is becoming a dictator, patriot act already allows him to stop free speech and elections indefinatly if needed in the event of a threat to the nation, whether that threat comes from outside or within the government itself. Bush can pass a law, as long as congress makes the law thats how it works and the patriot act was designed to supress the constitution at the presidents will. Email me if you want the article link.
2007-08-03 09:33:47 · answer #1 · answered by Benotafraid 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When I got Born-Again, I Became Part of a Nation within a Nation.
Children of GOD living in America
(GODs Nation) (U.S.A.)
I Love the U.S.A., lived here all of my Life.
I Love the Red White and Blue!!!
I Love Americans!!!
I Love GOD More.
I will support the U.S.A. until the Rapture, or unless it's Leaders become so Evil and Wicked that it Ain't the U.S.A. anymore, and if that happens we Will Lose Our Freedom of Speech.
Dit=============to!
2007-08-03 10:14:44 · answer #2 · answered by maguyver727 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1) Congress passes laws, not the President.
2) Any such law would be unconstitutional.
3) We're not under martial law.
2007-08-03 09:33:15 · answer #3 · answered by Cathy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It did no longer have something to do with protesting. It replaced into approximately assisting out the terrorists. Jeremiah could could desire to ascertain the bill of rights returned. The 2nd modification has no longer something to do with loose speech.
2016-12-11 09:23:57 · answer #4 · answered by latia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess that means all he has to do is put 70% of the voters in this country in jail. To quote Spongebob Squarepants: "Good luck with that".
Remember "free speech zones"? That "law" is stupid and can NOT be enforced legally.
2007-08-03 12:50:43 · answer #5 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he was Trying it it would not work. That would be covered under free speech. And I also believe there are still "organizations" to handle this if it by some chance passed.
2007-08-03 09:32:14 · answer #6 · answered by The true face of religion 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would have first had to rewrite the constitution huh? Only congress can pass laws. Jeez.
2007-08-03 09:32:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. I'm pretty sure Bush knows that he can't do that because of the whole "First Amendment" thingy
2007-08-03 09:44:01 · answer #8 · answered by David 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you are pulling my chain. at least it isn't as bad as what they did to Tillman though
2007-08-03 09:31:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋