The first one is a Christian who is also an American, whereas the second one is an American who is also Christian.
I would say the first one suggests that the person who identifies themselves as this considers religion to be more important than nationality, whereas the second one has that reversed - nationality is more important.
The first one also has connections in my mind with a fanatical Christian, whereas the second one presents the idea of the person being calmer about it, more just happening to be Christian rather than have it seriously affect their lives.
2007-08-03 06:17:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Devolution 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes they do: the first one stresses that before being a Christian, that person is first of all an American, while the second one stresses the contrary;)
2007-08-03 05:47:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Love_my_Cornish_Knight❤️ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess you figure putting one ahead of the other, some might wonder about the priorities. Even together they make you wonder. It sounds more like a political statement to some or maybe not racist of maybe so. To many possibilities. Choose your poison.
2007-08-03 09:31:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by hb12 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm stable question. properly for theist whilst they say i think in Jesus, they think in each and every of the failings that he can do, each and every of the failings that are linked with him, or they think that each and every person issues are achieveable by using Jesus. This final sentence i think of ability that a theory in Jesus provide you with the capability to do many stuff. some human beings might take this to an entire new point, yet they do no longer seem to be searching for capability they are looking for an excuse to do something. in spite of each and every little thing, you in basic terms choose for an excuse to do something, once you're doing something undesirable. As for the atheist, i don't be conscious of. i'm no longer one. might desire to or no longer it is that their "have faith" is they do no longer seem to be open to the considered faith, yet are in basic terms open to the considered different issues. to no longer have faith in something closes each and every little thing approximately that one concern. that's a void subject in ones unsleeping. no be counted how lots they attempt, they won't in any respect open their self as much as the single concern that they don't have faith in. it is not any longer on purpose, it in basic terms happens. possibly using fact of this such a lot of theist are insulted by utilising perceived assaults on their faith? when you consider that they are extra open to issues concerning their faith, in addition they might permit in evaluations of people who don't think.
2016-10-09 03:25:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by morabito 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
same thing
2007-08-03 05:51:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by drinklifetothelees 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol, same thing
2007-08-03 05:45:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by DevanK 3
·
1⤊
0⤋