...So that the entire world can have a laugh at their expense?
No, this is not my baby. My son is 14 years old and a fine, intelligent young man. I have never put his picture on the internet and I never will.
2007-08-03 04:35:43 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I didn't put this pic online. It was already there. I just found it.
Let that be a lesson to all you parents out there.
2007-08-03 04:48:12 · update #1
I agree with you, I don't see anything good coming out of posting any child's picture or information online.
2007-08-03 04:41:39 · answer #1 · answered by Big Daddy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be irresponsible if say you put a pic of your daughter up there with your home address.... Though I don't put pics of my son or myself online, what the hell would I care what someone else thinks about the way we look? Are people truly that pathetic that they have to pick on everything like that? I'd say those that do, really need to get a life, because obviously they don't have anything else going for them other than to laugh at others.
2007-08-03 04:58:57 · answer #2 · answered by River 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it IS irresponsible to do that. But don't think you're innocent by posting that baby photo. It doesn't matter that you didn't originally post it on the internet. You're re-posting it, and that's just as bad. And you say you're posting it as a lesson to all those who post theirs? You USED a baby to teach a lesson. THAT is irresponsible.
You started off with a good topic; irresponsible parents who post their kid's photos, and I was initially impressed because I'm sure you meant well, but now you're just as guilty as they are, so don't try and hide behind that flimsy excuse. Pure hypocrisy.
2007-08-04 01:28:31 · answer #3 · answered by Sacrificial 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great pic, what a cute little thinker! LOL I agree, it's not good to do that to your kids. My son is 13, and has his own myspace where he puts his own picture, if he wants to. But I don't do anything to embarrass him, I know how stressful that can be to kids. If someone is going to laugh at him, let it be the mean kids in school, not the people who are supposed to love him the most.
2007-08-03 04:50:35 · answer #4 · answered by RealRachel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-08-03 04:42:54 · answer #5 · answered by Petina 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but I think it's even more irresponsible when people put pictures of OTHER PEOPLE'S KIDS online, like you have, you baaaaaad man!!!!!
2007-08-03 04:44:55 · answer #6 · answered by Grotty Bodkin is not dead!!! 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They're probably hoping Getty Images will pay them for rights to the photo
2007-08-03 04:38:40 · answer #7 · answered by Southpaw 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
anyone who puts pics of a child on the Internet is a moron
2007-08-03 04:42:03 · answer #8 · answered by Jack 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-08-03 04:38:48 · answer #9 · answered by Conscious-X 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes!
A face only a mother could love!!!
2007-08-03 04:49:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋