why doesn't everyone join unions then have them campaign for wages to be linked to house price rises?
Every time house prices rise those without a house/mortage are effectively having a massive wage cut so surely wages should be measured in 'percentage of the average house price'
And all getting togther to force this union wise and restore final salary pensions.
As that way the workers get their fair pay for fair work not bosses in coccaine, prostitues and other luxuries they dont need
2007-08-03
00:26:57
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Joey
3
in
Business & Finance
➔ Careers & Employment
➔ Other - Careers & Employment
COSMIC
DOES IT REALLY MATTER IF ITS ANY ISIM social or other wise as long as people have a decent life?
2007-08-03
00:39:14 ·
update #1
Erm hairy Mary...
This aint a left wing government its a similar system to right wing conservatives.
And that min wage is way to small
2007-08-03
00:40:27 ·
update #2
****************************
79 evet... Im sorry but you know how it works in China where people have to work like 80 hour weeks for virtually no pay and no rights?
how is that a good thing... more like exploitation.
How about if the companies were not allowed to move aborad. if it had to come out of their vast profits.
Im sorry whats hurtful about decent medial packaages.
im mean your exectuative get massive pay.
Surely its the fat cat wages that hurt the companies and given their high profits whats hurting them.
Comapnies exisst to give people an inclome, boss or worker or shareholder. so whats wrong with a fair distribution.
Surely anyone moving to china should be made to work under chinese conditions which resemble slave labour camps
2007-08-03
00:56:03 ·
update #3
Plus with a lower percentage of income for houseing costs people would have more to spend on godds and services
2007-08-03
01:01:23 ·
update #4
***************************
DAVUID AND BUTTER THERE IS ALREADDY ECONOMIC COLLAPSE AS THE ECONOMY IS MEASURED ON HOW ABLE THE LOWEST ARE ABLE TO AFFORD A HOUSE AND DECENT LIFE., IF THEY CANT AFFORD A HOUSE ON A DECENT DAYS WORK THEN WHATS THE POINT...
OH AND HAD LOTS OF JOBS MATE ONLY THEY ARE POCKET MONEY JOBS WHERE YOU CANT AFFORD TO LIVE , INCLUDING WORKING HARD AND GOING THOUGH UNI
2007-08-03
08:39:02 ·
update #5
GOT THE SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE ONLY GOT ME KNOWHERE LIKEWISE THE WORK EXPERIENCE.
PUT IN THE EFFORT SO YES OWED
2007-08-03
08:40:35 ·
update #6
Union participation is actually declining in this country. Becuase union demands have detroyed many industries in this country and forced them to move manufacturing offshore. Housing has gone up almost 40% in the last five years. If you raised salaries by the same \amount, the cost of goods and services in this coutnry would be s high, no one could afford them and outside goods would be brought (China) for example. This would create more job losses. The union demands for medical and pension benefits far exceed those received by non union workers, tlook at the auto industry. Ford and GM have been hurt dramatically by Japanese mfgs whose employee costs are half of what there's are. Unions served a good purpose in the early part of the 20th centruy. They don't do much now, and there has been much corruption with union heads in the past. Now we have a situation where civil service, police and teacher unions receive such great medical andpension benefits, it driving up property taxes to the point were more and more forclosures are happening. It's a crime. Where I live a police officer makes $105,000 after five years. Reitres after 20 yers does not pay anything for medical and the public has to support them for more years retired than working. It's absurd. Unions are destroying the middle class who have to pay for all this.
2007-08-03 00:40:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by 79vette 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it would bring complete economic collapse. Plus there would be no one to work for because it wouldn't be worht taking the risk of starting your own business because all the risk would be on your shoulders and ther would be no reward left at the end of the day. Any money a company pays you has to be generated by your proprotionate contribution either physically now or in the past or by the risk that you take on behalf of the other people working for the company. You're an idiot if you think that idea will ever work just because you run your own business it doesn't mean you are loaded !!!!!! When was the last time you had a job? If ever
2007-08-03 02:16:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by David V 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because most people don't believe unions can offer that solution. Wages indexed to a baizarre cost of living indicator would be a disaster; ask Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter
2007-08-03 00:29:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by wizjp 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If a company is forced to increase wages, then they have to increase the price of the product to be able to pay the higher wages. This would include the housing industry, so the price of houses would continue to rise with the cost of wages.
If you want more money, get more knowledge and skills and stop thinking that anyone OWES you anything. Bill Gates and Warren Buffet, the two richest men in the US were not born with a silver spoon. They worked for what they got.
2007-08-03 03:45:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by butter1944fly 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because joining a union costs money every month, money people don't have to spare, due to their low wages.
Your question maybe should have been. Why do the British put up with this Sh*t Loony Left Labour Goverment who introduced a "minimum" wage and who keep us all on the poverty line by doing so.
2007-08-03 00:36:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because unions have been rendered toothless by global outsourcing.
You'll wind up with your wages indexed to housing prices in China.
2007-08-03 00:30:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by sdc_99 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unions don't work that way..
Prices of housing in US are not really regulated. It's complete market economy. High demand, high prices. Low demand, low prices.....
No free market economy would work that way...
Isn't this socialism? communism? marxism? what ism?
2007-08-03 00:31:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unions are weak since the Thatcher era, low paid workers would still not be able to obtain a mortgage due to the way banks decide suitability.
2007-08-03 00:31:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by ALLEN B 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Joey , Joey , won't work . You forget who run the unions , their leaders are no different than the other crooks . Not to mention you will have to pay monthly union dues so where would your savings be ? :))
2007-08-03 00:31:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Unions are not effective in all the matters.
2007-08-10 23:43:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋