English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-02 20:02:12 · 23 answers · asked by Roger S 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

And i mean "poison" and not "opium"

2007-08-02 20:33:41 · update #1

23 answers

No, liberalism is.

That pretty much explains Marx's view. Way left...attacking his antithesis while spewing nonsense presented as truth.

Grins :)

2007-08-10 19:41:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I believe the original quote was 'opium,' not poison. However, it does seem that religion (especially of an organized and/or nationalistic sort) is certainly a distraction for 'the masses.' Regardless of political standing, an argument may always be defined by one's adherence to a religion (or lack thereof). Those few who are unaffected by religious bias (the scientific community and the so-called 'intelligentsia') are always the strategic targets
for dictatorships and political coups. Paradoxically, there always seem to be some 'Men of the Cloth' who are solely dedicated to educating the poor masses. Unfortunately, these are also usually educated individuals, dedicated to educating others, that share their secular brethrens' predilection for selection as dissidents, and thus political targets.

2007-08-03 03:19:56 · answer #2 · answered by enragedwombat 3 · 0 0

Comes from Karl Marx. Here is the full quote:

"Religious distress is at the same time the expression of real distress and the protest against real distress. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions."
Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right

2007-08-03 03:06:57 · answer #3 · answered by buddhamonkeyboy 4 · 5 0

Kinda.

It is more the opiate or the Bacardi 151 of the masses.

2007-08-03 03:10:02 · answer #4 · answered by Mere Mortal 7 · 0 0

I like the first responder's answer. (It was Marx who said that religion is the opiate of the masses.) For much more on this, see:

2007-08-03 03:10:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The opiate of the masses I believe is the saying. Another words no thought involved in some cases

2007-08-03 03:04:59 · answer #6 · answered by runic111 5 · 4 1

I think its the antidote for whatever is poisoning the masses.

2007-08-10 13:25:59 · answer #7 · answered by akoypinoy 4 · 0 0

When people fly airplanes into buildings and say, "We're doing this for God", something is very wrong with our God Concept. Religion always accentuates the positive and forgets the negative.

2007-08-03 03:12:04 · answer #8 · answered by liberty11235 6 · 2 0

Every elder feels he is wiser than the youngster, so this concept, to ensure obedience/slavery, of masses to the masters of wisdom.

2007-08-10 15:11:17 · answer #9 · answered by son 2 · 0 0

Salam Alaikum Wu RahmatAllah Wu Barakathou
You may not recognise this text. But your using it every time you hit "SUBMIT".

If you can explain the text I have placed here, then you can explain to me Isa. A.s. for you have been given knowledge vast beyond your imagination. It came from Allah SWT not you!

Every nano second we are moving this kind of text over 1 billion times a nano second! Just by hitting "Submit". Allah does have order have a great look!
Salam

Source(s):

SessionID="7">... FriendlyName="Ubadah"/>MY DAD... FriendlyName="Ubadah"/>MY IMAM... FriendlyName="Ubadah"/>I WILL NOT EVER LEAVE HIM... FriendlyName="Ubadah"/>NEVER

2007-08-11 02:07:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers