Yes, there are still considered Protestants. Methodists weren't part of the Reformation either, but they are also Protestant.
In fact, many people consider all non-Catholic and non-Orthodox denominations to be Protestant.
2007-08-02 17:09:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nightwind 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
In general they are considered "Protestants" (protesters of certain Catholic doctrines) although some Baptists may rather be known as "Protestant protesters" as well. Some Baptists would claim a heritage from the Anabaptists.
The main distinction is a belief that baptism is to be done after a personal decision to follow Christ rather than done as a baby, which is considered to be contrary to the Scriptures. There are several other differences but that is the main one.
2007-08-02 17:34:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by nicky 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Look there are two main branches of thought concerning this topic.
1. There have always been people who believe like Baptists and therefore Baptist are not protestants. This idea is called landmarkism. It was a popular idea but has recently fallen out of favor.
2. The other idea is that yes Baptists are off of the Protestant tree although we came along a little later than what are called main line Protestants which include the Lutherans and Presbeterians.
I grew a Baptist who believed in landmarkism, but have changed my views to position number 2.
look up landmarkism and read what it says
2007-08-02 17:14:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Future Citizen of Forvik 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Some Baptists like to separate themselves from other Protestants, but they are clearly based 100% on Protestant principles, and have their roots in other Protestant denominations. There are hundreds of Protestant denominations that didn't exist until long after the Protestant Rebellion of the 16th Century, so that is no measure of how Protestant a group is.
2007-08-02 17:12:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by PaulCyp 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Particular Baptists were formed as an English branch of Continental Protestantism, adopted the tenets of the Augsberg Confession, and embraced Calvinist theology. They rebelled against both Roman Catholicism and Anglicanism. I would say that is enough to qualify as Protestant, even if they were not instrumental to the original movement.
2007-08-02 17:17:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by NONAME 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Any churches that can trace it's roots or history back to the reformers of the reformation from the Catholic Church are called protestant churches! In other words, they are the daughters of the mother Church! They must believed in the Holy Trinity and in the Nicene Creed! Any churches that does not fall in these category are considered cults!
2007-08-03 00:36:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sniper 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well it all depends on what history books you read. The acutal denomination was started by John Smyth. In 1609, Smyth, along with a group in Holland, came to believe in believer's baptism (as opposed to infant baptism) and they came together to form one of the earliest Baptist churches. Yes I have read the "Trail of Blood". I have also seen the books other denominations use as "proof" that they were the true chrisian faith before the protestant reformation.
2007-08-02 17:17:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Baptist church homes run each and every of ways from the extremely conservative evangelical fundamentalists to the Anabaptist German Baptist (very comparable in dress and practices to the Mennonites and Amish) to extra mainstream protest denominations. There are quite a few diverse communities (or conventions) in the area of Baptist denominations, such using fact the Southern Baptist convention, which had the doubtful honor of being between the final strongholds of racial bigotry, each and every of ways as much as the mid Nineteen Nineties. using fact of their view of African-individuals (blacks), The be conscious Southern in Southern Baptist convention stems from its having been based and rooted in the Southern u . s . a .. In 1845, individuals at a community convention being held in Augusta, Georgia created the SBC, following a chop up from northern Baptists over the project of forbidding church homes in slaveholding states from sending missionaries to unfold the gospel. After the yank Civil conflict, yet another chop up got here approximately: maximum black Baptists in the South separated from white church homes to establish self sufficient congregations, community institutions, and state and national conventions, such using fact the national Baptist convention, the 2nd greatest Baptist convention. In 1995, the convention voted to undertake a decision renouncing its racist roots and apologizing for its previous protection of slavery, segregation, and white supremacism. This marked the denomination's first formal acknowledgment that racism had a profound function in its early and cutting-edge historic past. The convention has known that the demographics of the united states have been changing and has made an attempt to recruit new individuals between minority populations. when you consider that then decision, the SBC has made super strides in welcoming all minorities. it somewhat is barely one occasion of a number of the controversies surrounding the "Baptist" church homes. Please observe that there is not any _one_ corporation or hierarchy between the Baptists as there are between Catholics, Anglicans, Presbyterians, and so on. as a result, whilst the Westboro Baptist Church may well be a humiliation to Christians extra often than no longer and all Baptists in specific, there is not any way for the countless Baptist church homes to "defrock" the Westboro congregation and its ministers, in contrast to there is between denominations that have extra centralized management and hierarchy.
2016-10-09 02:45:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that yes cause they still protest against what the early protester claimed.
2007-08-02 17:10:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone who is not a Catholic is a Protestant.
2007-08-02 17:10:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by October 7
·
0⤊
0⤋