suggests?
2007-08-02 14:19:25 · 16 answers · asked by Jmyooooh 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You're making the critical assumption that life has only developed here. The universe is a big place. We're not really privy to see what is going on in other corners of it, at least not on a small-scale.
Most of our planetary discoveries from other star systems are made indirectly. We usually can't even see the planet itself (unless it passes in front of the star, which works for larger gas worlds in some cases, if we get lucky with the timing.)
Even this at best would give us just a general spectral reading of the planet, and we MIGHT be able to determine its chemical makeup.
However, would we be able to determine if there's life there? Nope.
2007-08-02 14:25:46 · answer #1 · answered by Lunarsight 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There is absolutely no evidence that suggests that the planet Earth is the only place in the universe where life exists.
2007-08-02 14:55:17 · answer #2 · answered by Nunyabusiness 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The physique born of earthly issues, sure, evolving physique ? sure, it evolves into airborne dirt and dirt, God made it that way. The spirit is yet another tale, the heart and suggestions, the being interior the physique, this does relatively evolve onward, it is evolution, it is volume, vocal, while the residing God is in contact, it is invoked and ensigned, to be invulnerable(spiritually), it is vocal ! All are in contact, many don't understand they are in contact yet they are, even the atheists are in contact, in evolving, the spirit, the Lord, the father, Jesus, son of guy(flesh,terra,earth) from earth to earth(airborne dirt and dirt). There are merely 2 factors to a conflict, the conflict I see is between good and evil, lite and darkish, proper and incorrect, the physique has no place in this conflict on the guidance table, it is not mandatory, this would be a psychological conflict(spirit), no longer a actual conflict(flesh), seek for the heavens first and all, the physique will persist with.
2016-12-15 04:13:46 · answer #3 · answered by galle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Earth is the only planet in the solar system capable of supporting human life.
Two bodies capable of sustaining life have not been explored. Mars has only been superficially explored.
2007-08-02 14:27:22 · answer #4 · answered by novangelis 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Who says there's only life on planet Earth? There are many Amino Acids and such floating around in space
2007-08-02 14:26:27 · answer #5 · answered by ryoma136 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Have you been to other planets to check?
No? Then why would you assume that the earth is the ONLY planet with diverse life on it?
2007-08-02 14:27:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think "science" has suggested that creating life IS easy. In fact I'm pretty darn sure that abiogenesis was a tough ordeal.
2007-08-02 14:22:02 · answer #7 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 8⤊ 0⤋
One. We do not know that we are alone as the only bastion of life.
Two. Why don't you familiarize your self with the science in this area before you go shooting off you ignorant mouth about what science suggests.
2007-08-02 14:30:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Simply because there is no reason to believe that there is only living creatures in this planet.
2007-08-02 14:24:58 · answer #9 · answered by Lalo 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most planets lack enough oxygen and hydrogen, while contain to much CO2 and other harmful gases.
2007-08-02 14:24:46 · answer #10 · answered by fireypitsofhell69 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋