2007-08-02 08:42:13 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I hadn't thought of that, ZC. You're right.
2007-08-02 08:49:02 · update #1
I've been to one of those!
Although we called it a "war protest."
2007-08-02 08:46:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
that's straightforward for guy to assert ''ohhhhhhhhh the naughty lady having an abortion, the murderer'' using fact we've not have been given any thought what that's choose for to have a newborn or extra importantly supply one,no longer to point stay with the end results of being a lone discern and the destiny denial of a extra controlled happiness. An abortion might desire to continually be an determination for those women folk that are put in a place the place their lives are put in jeopardy, the place their lives would be completely disrupted and the place the youngster is to be heavily mentally and bodily disabled yet continually the girl's determination except the youngster is totally shaped and the girl has no reason to abort different than a destroy up with the youngster's father. undergo in suggestions errors have not in basic terms ruined the girl in many circumstances finished families go through using fact of undesirable pregnancies. in basic terms undergo in suggestions the fetes has no high quality of existence using fact it has no longer experienced existence on the earth in basic terms existence in the womb. ATB pink
2016-10-09 01:56:36 · answer #2 · answered by ramswaroop 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They say a sin is a sin. Isn't that disgusting? They ignore how permanent murder is, somehow saying that homosexual love is equivalent to destroying someone else. At least they could still perform their senseless bashing on people still alive...
However, dze and a few others are correct. Murder as a lifestyle is not being proposed as homosexuality is, so they are naturally alarmed by it.
I think experience would teach them some things.
"They know not what they do."
2007-08-02 09:22:21 · answer #3 · answered by Skye 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Catholic Church,and I am sure other denominations as well,have frequently held vigils and rallies with regard to unusually brutal or unsolved homicides,or an elevation of homicides in impoverished neighborhoods. Such vigils are almost invariably organized by clergy. I do not know of a single instance of such an event being organized by atheists. The idea is ridiculous. Yes,of course murder is "worse" than homosexuality,although I don't see how that purely rhetorical statement/question is connected to the first part of your bipartite "question".
2007-08-02 08:49:11 · answer #4 · answered by Brynn 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Everyone objects to murder. Homosexuality creates a murder of a very subtle kind. Let me explain what I mean.
If a single person in any of your generations at any point in your ancestoral history was a practicing homosexual, all people born after that point would not exist.
If your grandfather was one, do a study and count all the people who would not be there.
Then you will begin to see the danger of homosexuality to millions of human beings. No one on any side supports murders (except in wars, everyone who is a right winger or a left winger seems to forget that war is literally murder).
But people do have rallies against wars.
If all men would become homosexual at any point, the entire population of the earth would vanish from that point forward.
I hope I am making sense to you.
2007-08-02 08:48:58 · answer #5 · answered by NQV 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think many do every time the death penalty is about to be enforced. Oh, and when they protest abortion, they call that "murder" too.
Personally I'm not too fond of the death penalty. Unless we're absolutely 100% certain the person is guilty (not just guilty "beyond reasonable doubt" which isn't always a strict standard) then I don't think the permanence of death is appropriate given the unreliable nature of "reasonable doubt".
2007-08-02 08:44:51 · answer #6 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
yes it is worse.
Also, since the fundamentalists seem to try to base their prejudice on the bible, why don't they have anti-fat rallies? Overeating is condemned in the bible: could it be cuz so many of them are HUGE?
Why don't they have pro-slavery rallies? The bible supports slavery. Why don't they have "stone the adulteresses" rallies? The bible says we should stone any women to death who gets caught playing around on her husband.
The truth: fundamentalis pick and choose what they want from the bible. They hate gay people because we're an easy target and because they're afraid of their own genitals, they hate seeing people having fun with theirs.
PS Most Christians I know wouldn't go to an anti-gay rally for a million dollars. They're smarter and kinder in general than fundamentalists.
2007-08-02 08:48:33 · answer #7 · answered by Acorn 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Good Point. I don't know what Christianity as a whole thinks, but I would be in agreement that Murder is up there in the top 10 of all time worst sins...OH, THAT's right, it is!
Ok fine, give me thumbs down, maybe all sin is equal in God's eyes, until everyone can come to a consensus that being gay is a sin - and not everyone agrees to that, but I do think most of us agree that murder is a sin - TO ME MURDER IS WORSE. Maybe it's all equal to God, but not to me.
2007-08-02 08:45:02 · answer #8 · answered by Marvelissa VT 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Of course it isn't.
Haven't you noticed most violence is pretty easy to get past the censors ... but sex?
USian Kultcha has a real hang-up with sex and if it's a bit different from the norm even though it's consenting adults ... wow; can't handle that.
2007-08-02 08:50:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Excellent point. Many Christians are sidetracked. Murder is worse than homosexuality.
2007-08-02 08:47:02 · answer #10 · answered by David B 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Maybe they could start with a small anti hate rally and work their way up?
2007-08-02 08:44:54 · answer #11 · answered by t_rex_is_mad 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋