Do you agree on this...?

Question

I THEREFORE CONCLUDE...

"Every human being will NEVER get to agree on ONE thing."



I rest my case.

Answer 1

I can't concur. If there were suddenly an intergalactic war which threatened to destroy the Earth, EVERY human being might agree to fight.

Answer 2

Agree

Answer 3

Depending on the situation, I agree, or I disagree, we'll never get along, but if there is some sort of great emergency that may threaten to wipe out the entire human race, then yes, I think people will unite and face that threat...but otherwise, no.

Answer 4

True, there is not one thing in the world, every one will agree on.
Its so weird, cause for somethings there's just so much evidence but there just seem to be a lot of controversies

Answer 5

Oh I don't know... if I were to say that you are an idiot, I am sure I could get a few people to agree with me, (oh.. and kill the rest for being idiots) thereby reducing your case to its ultimate demise.

BTW Belladonna should switch to caffeine free.

Answer 6

Hi there man with hat, nope you are wrong again. Erroneous thinking. Shall I show you why? Or let you work it out for yourself? Go, on I will help you out. You seem like a nice enough bloke. Been a sunny day too.

You are not seeing PO. Now Po is the alternative. Whatever that alternative may be. We don't have to know what Po is to accept that we can use it, that it exists. This comes from Edward De Bono's concept if you want to read some more.

Our language is not enough to explain ourselves fully enough so that others can really understand us. Not written language, spoken language, body language or whatever, adequately conveys how we feel to another.

How many times have you held a conversation, written something, held out your arms to your partner for it to be totally misinterpreted? Millions of times like the rest of us?

So what is this PO? YES NO OR PO (something different not yet identified). Now If I am correct in what I say and your view is different to mine that assumes that you are incorrect?

What If I am correct in my view, but you hold a different view, the view we share may be PO.

This will be different in each individual circumstance, it is a 'porridge' word, fluid, without meaning. Not just compromise. Compromise entails sacrifice or unwanted adjustment in one or both person's views. This leads ultimately to resentment.

So it may mean that in the time we talk to each other, we recognize the value of some of the other person's views so we start to form a new 'joint PO view' this is a different view from either person's views but encompasses parts of both views that are acceptable to both parties.

It may be that we become entrenched in our own views but can find a 'PO way to deal with this' so we can live harmoniously if not in agreement, without compromising our own views.

It may mean that 'any PO solution' will be unsatisfactory to either or both of us, FOR EACH SINGULAR EVENT/IDEA we then have different routes in which to manage this or not.

Draw up a flow chart with yes, no or Po choices like in a flow chart cost benefit analysis and try this for yourself. You can never reach a point when there is not room for PO if this is drawn correctly. The only way you can reach NO is if you chose NO. No is a valid choice.

Now you can chose no and you can believe that every human being will never get to agree on one thing. But I don't want to chose that I will go for Yes, or at worst Po.

Is this because I am shouting the loudest? So you can not be heard? So why don't you shout as loud as me? Then nobody can be heard? Is that not what you want? I can not gain privilege above you if I can not be heard.

Now if you don't want to shout then that is up to you. You have chosen a NO option. Means I do not have to shout but can still insist on my privileges. So I still gain advantage over you.

You can not persuade me not to seek privilege because I told you I am clever, cute and very greedy when it comes to succulent lobsters and Alpha Males.

So how are you going to persuade me to listen to your view? Really listen to your view? You missed the obvious Man in Hat. If enough people who quietly share your view act with you then the quiet voices override the single loud voice.

In diversity and working together there is massive strength. You are not a lone voice, you are one of many voices who can insist on Fair Shares. Each loud voice can be extinguished, quietly, one by one by many voices seeking Fair Shares for all.

Now I could demonstrate both these YES answers in lots of different ways using different tools but (and again this is the last but man in hat) I will assume that you are getting pretty fed up with me by now so just take my word eh? Even if it is only a PO acceptance rather than an outright NO.

I therefore conclude that 'Every human being will be able to agree on 'most' things.

I rest my case. Or and don't you think it is about time you blocked me Man in Hat?

Answer 7

"All human beings require air to breathe"

Do you agree? Better yet, does anyone disagree?

I win.

Answer 8

If there is overwhelming evidence to support an idea, why would there be disagreements?

GOD bless

Answer 9

Every knee with bow,
every tongue will confess
that Jesus Christ is Lord.

Answer 10

i'm not sure i understood exactly what you mean. but anyway, i do agree people are undecided and have opinions so different!