English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The USA is a terrorist nation...no question about it...but we are well financed professional terrorists. NOT amatuers.

Why should we use cheap car bombs when we can spend billions on Stealth Bombers and other high tech JUNK.


The USA is its own worst enemy... defeated by the greed and arrogance of its own people

2007-08-02 02:26:45 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

Anti american.. IGNORANCE is not anti american...DUH

We will lose in IRAQ sooner the better

2007-08-02 02:56:36 · update #1

14 answers

#1 Kiss My A-ss
#2 Go To He-ll
#3 Go fock your goat
#4 They started it we'll finish it Beatch
#5 Focking sniveling coward
#6 takes a lotta guts to murder innocent women and children you waste of sperm
#7 gawddamn punk azz SOB
#8 forget focking your goat its too good for you
#9 go make love to Bin Laden
#10 go to canada whiny azz ignorant fockface

one american soldier can kill 20 sniveling cowardly goat riding terrorists any day of the week you MONUMENTAL JACKASS

2007-08-02 07:46:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Napalm hasn't been used in decades. Agent Orange was a defoliant, used to clear jungle out, not used as as weapon. Nukes have only been used twice, a few days apart. We used them to END one of the bloodiest wars in history. By using them we actually saved more Japanese and American lives that would have been lost in an invasion of the Japanese homeland.
If you think that we are a terrorist nation you have some severe mental problems. Get a grip on reality and put down the hash pipe. By using our "high tech junk" we are preventing the use of saturation carpet bombing. We are killing fewer innocent lives this way.
You are right in one thing though. We are our own worst enemy because of our political system allowing idiots like Pelosi and Reid to come to high national power. If we lose in Iraq it will be because of politicians limiting the way our military can fight. The ground troops are not allowed to return fire most of the time. Which makes them targets even more. This has got to end NOW! If we are fired upon, we should be able to return that fire with every bit of force available to us. If we are not allowed to KILL the enemy, we cannot win. Liberals like you are the reason this is they way it is. You whine and cry that we are killing people, but you couldn't care less about our own people who were killed.
If you are so upset with our country DO SOMETHING about it or shut the bloody heck up!

2007-08-02 10:22:10 · answer #2 · answered by SpaceMonkey67 6 · 5 0

Neither Napalm nor Agent Orange were designed as weapons. They were invented to kill plant life in Nam and they did a great job but if people were in that plant life they would die a horrible death. You need to do some research and see the truth about things before you accuse the US of anything. Terrorists use these things to kill and murder. Nothing more.

2007-08-02 10:29:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Need specially equipped planes for agent orange. Don't know why they would want to go to the trouble of manufacture. It has little value as a direct or indirect weapon. They would do just as well with a bunch of Round-Up.

Napalm: They don't have many aircraft to dump it from.

Nukes: They will, Allah willing.

2007-08-02 14:08:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We used over 17 million gallons of agent orange in the Vietnam War, two nukes against Japan, and we've used Napalm since god knows when. I don't know why these terrorists don't use them against us. Consider we were the ones who funded Saddam Hussein, and others. It's only a matter of time I guess. But I don't agree that we are terrorists. To my knowledge we never actually targeted civilians on purpose just to demoralize, or commit jihad against our enemy.

2007-08-02 10:24:07 · answer #5 · answered by Shane 1 · 3 1

You are an idiot. If you really feel that way then go move to Iraq or Afganistan and join your brothers in Jihad against the evil USA. Anything short of that and you are either a hypocrit or a coward.

Anyhow, let us know how it works out.

PS. John Walker Lindh might have been a complete head-case freak but at least he wasn't a pus$y like you.

2007-08-02 09:39:40 · answer #6 · answered by zeroang3l 2 · 7 0

*Yawn* Sorry, you were babbling about something?

We Americans were busy inventing everything, defending liberty from morons and keeping the planet from collapsing into a bunch of mastu**8ting idiots sitting around in tents.

And by the way, you don't qualify as an "armcrusher" with those little noodle arms. Remember, we may be outnumbered, but we are never outgunned!

2007-08-02 09:47:56 · answer #7 · answered by morgan j 4 · 4 0

We don't use any of those and haven't in a long time.

Why don't you leave if you hate our country so much? I'm sure you will end up in some terrorist group where you can find out what weapons we use right before we use them to kill you and your friends.

2007-08-02 09:44:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Oh you poor thing did those libtard professors screw up that little pot smoking brain of yours?????

If you hate this country go live with Fidel or Kin Jung mentally ill.
Or Chavez.

You should be very happy there.

2007-08-02 09:43:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I suppose a weapon can be used to threaten *passively* or actually be used to kill or maim. Others might use a tremendous capability to manufacture things as a threat.

2007-08-02 09:36:09 · answer #10 · answered by A Guy 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers