2007-08-01 09:23:03 · 10 answers · asked by larry j 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Perhaps you need to read it again, or better yet, get it on audio.
2007-08-01 09:26:32 · answer #1 · answered by Hot Coco Puff 7 · 9⤊ 0⤋
I assume you're talking about the King James English of 1611. Yeah, we no longer talk like that. That's why I'm a fan of more modern translations that are translated into our language, not a language used 400 years ago.
2007-08-01 16:27:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're probably reading a Bible in Old English. Try a translation written in modern English.
2007-08-01 16:28:01 · answer #3 · answered by Mabes 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
oh sweety. I know that this is a joke so I'll humor you. English wasn't even spoken back then so when it got translated a long time ago, it was translated into the King's english. Thus the King James Version.
2007-08-01 16:28:52 · answer #4 · answered by peach49444 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, that's just how the english was back then
get a Bible called "The Message" or "Word on the Street," they're both written to more modern-day language
2007-08-01 16:30:20 · answer #5 · answered by zs_a_rose_by_any_other_name_zs 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ye olde Englishth lol
2007-08-01 16:30:25 · answer #6 · answered by Zappster (Deep Thunker) 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Haaaahhaaa! LOL.
2007-08-01 16:27:39 · answer #7 · answered by Nurse Winchester 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blasphemyth. Blasphemyth. You are going to hellth.
Good one....
2007-08-01 16:51:25 · answer #8 · answered by jasong25 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
*sighs*
I think you'll find it's 17th century english grammar rules.
2007-08-01 16:28:06 · answer #9 · answered by ShemaYisrael 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are gonna geteth some major heateth for this. I suggesteth you deleteth it now........ eth
2007-08-01 16:27:50 · answer #10 · answered by ~Smurfette~ 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋