Our government is FASCIST. There shouldn't be a drinking age AT ALL. Drinking is COOL anyway. It's all part of growing up, and it helps kids fit in. The government doesn't have the right to tell me what I can do with my body, and neither do my parents. Did you know that Nazi Germany restricted drinking for their citizens?
Also, "drinking and driving" has been scientifically proven to not cause accidents. BAD DRIVERS cause accidents. Good drivers can drive perfectly well after drinking alcohol, because they know the road and how to handle different situations on the road. It's just a scam by our government to collect more fines and get rich. Our founding fathers would be DISGUSTED by the drinking age limit as well as the DUI policy. Don't you think so?
2007-08-01 07:57:02 · 24 answers · asked by snakeinaburger 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Family
I AM serious. This USED TO BE the land of the free, home of the brave...too much security, not enough liberty...
2007-08-01 08:06:13 · update #1
I think that alcohol should be illegal. Alcohol can be just as dangerous as drugs if not worse. And I think it's awful that you think drinking is "cool". I don't think it's very cool that you waste all your money on something stupid and that you may kill someone because you are being stupid. I don't think that having a couple drinks is bad, but drinking to get f***ed up is not right. I know you are just going to blow off what I'm saying since you like to drink, but maybe you or someone one you love will be injured or killed by a drunk driver and then you'll see how bad it is! No, I'm not wishing this upon you, I would never do that and I hope that it doesn't take that for you to see that drinking isn't "cool"!!
2007-08-01 08:04:12 · answer #1 · answered by Lyndsay P 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do you want to drink to fit in? I never did. I was an outcast because I refused to play sports or follow some stupid trend to fit in. But the best part about it is, these "fit in types", have failed miserably where I have surpassed them by far.
Drinking is not part of growing up, trial and error is.
You're right, drinking and driving does not cause accidents, it's the inconsiderate moron behind the wheel that is drunk. I'm a firm believer that if one should drink and drive, knowing very well that they can cause an accident or kill someone, the drinking and driving violation should be upgraded to premeditated attempted murder or premeditated murder. Which ever happened first.
You can do what you want, but it'll be your eventual destruction. Whether it's death or incarceration. Do you really want that on your conscience?
2007-08-01 08:31:20 · answer #2 · answered by tercentenary98 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Trust me, the law is perfectly fine the way it is. Drinking is not cool. What's so great about drinking so much that you get stupid? I mean, can you really be that stupid?? In fact, I think the drinking age should be higher, not lowered. Alcohol effects peoples minds and drinking DOES cause accidents, trust it from someone who's got in a car accident with a person who was a great driver but was drunk.
2007-08-01 08:25:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're like the kid I yelled at the other day for smoking a cigarette and giving some to other ten year olds. It's not smart or cool and the goverment DOES have the right to tell you that, they are not fascist. If they were you would be forced to have sex with a girl you didn't know and join the military that is if you aren't retarded in which case you would be exterminated or experimented with. Nope, sorry although we don't allow you to destroy yourself on perpose below the age of 18 we are not a fascist country or government.
2007-08-01 08:04:03 · answer #4 · answered by Fun2010 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Let's have our kids dying of liver damage before they hit puberty! Everyone is a good driver anyway, so drinking and driving should be legal!
Sounds to me like you're just going through the "rebellious" phase of puberty.
2007-08-01 08:01:39 · answer #5 · answered by Spazzcat 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There should be a drinking age, look how many get kill on highways drinking and driving do not mix and I think your NUTS for thinking about there shouldn't be a law on drinking, I for one think that the age should be 25 and older to drink OK NUT JOB.
2007-08-01 08:10:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You think drinking is cool? Yeah there is nothing like a slobbering slurring drunk in your face to make the day.
Watch a few episodes of COPS and see how cool the pathetic drunks on there are. The best part is watching them vomit and also beating their spouses. Theres nothing cooler than that.
2007-08-01 08:07:47 · answer #7 · answered by Dovahkiin 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i think of it additionally should be because it somewhat is in Europe... you ignored the incontrovertible fact that we are going to deliver our 18 365 days previous's to conflict yet no longer enable them to drink. I additionally sense the appliance age could be relative to the new child. As in if a 14 365 days previous that lives and works on a farm or rural section knows of the thank you to force a truck... enable em force, specific privileges for people who want a license at youthful an prolonged time. yet make it harder to get the licenses interior the 1st place. i think of initially in the event that they replaced our rules it would take some years for persons to get use to it, and for the youngsters of that age on the time of the swap they may be at a extra robust possibility of probability by way of fact they does no longer be arranged for the duty. yet interior the long-term its the wonderful factor to do. If as a u . s . a ., we enable those babies to become infantrymen.... i've got self belief that as a u . s . a ., we ought to continuously pour them a drink till now they circulate. To think of a new child can die interior the line of "duty" and yet on no account have had the privilege to be seen an entire grownup by skill of sharing a drink with acquaintances and kinfolk (legally) is an abomination. I additionally think of that there could be no eating age. i've got self belief that the duty of those issues could learn with out the want for a criminal age cut back. i comprehend some 10 365 days olds that are extra to blame than sixteen 365 days olds. So if shall we instruct employing at a youthful age; as quickly as the new child has become a reckless teen, they have already got the mandatory employing skills below their belt and don't sense the ought to objective the barriers of the vehicle and their loss of skills. Uping th employing age merely makes older unexperienced drivers. very own responsibiity has been taken remote from us (by skill of the government and regulation) which makes us much less likley to act responsibly. it somewhat is human nature. i began out discovering employing skills very youthful (approximately 8-10) below supervision of my father. I surpassed my try at 15 years previous, in a known, the 1st time, with flying colorations. and that i've got on no account led to or been in (by way of protecting employing) and accident. I actual have been a criminal driving force for 18 years. If i can do it, so can others.
2016-10-13 09:27:13 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tell that to my friends parents who just lost there son in a drunk driving accident.You are a moron.Grow up.Drinking at an early age makes you look stupid and can harm you mentally and physically.You really should see someone about your anger management problem.
2007-08-01 08:22:09 · answer #9 · answered by gerdie65 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you need to see a counselor because drinking is not the answer..it messes up alot of things that could be different in this world
2007-08-01 08:04:09 · answer #10 · answered by kauaichic420 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋