If E=mc^2 and Newton’s laws are true. It proves God's exist bottom line so line up all the so-called evidence for evolution you want. An object in motion will remain in motion till acted upon by another object. And an object at rest will remain at rest until acted upon by another object. and the universe is moving.
2007-07-31 20:42:14 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
what set the universe in motion if no outside force caused it.
2007-07-31 20:49:21 · update #1
if one was to slide an object across a frictionless surface when would that object stop if nothing got in it way it would stop it would keep going on forever if this statement is not correct please show me where it is false.
2007-07-31 21:04:59 · update #2
Newton's laws prove God???
Now THAT is why I would call Christians illogical.
2007-07-31 20:44:29 · answer #1 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 10⤊ 0⤋
it is as close to to an apt answer I care to grant to this tedious uninformed question. Theism = perception in gods - a non secular place - no longer a faith. Atheism = NO perception in gods - a non secular place - no longer a faith. Atheism is a end. An intellectually ordinary one. anybody is born atheist = no perception in gods = no longer theist. Theism/atheism is approximately perception - no longer the how or why one arrived at that perception. “Humanity grew to become into plodding alongside and then sooner or later some smartarze reported thunder grew to become into brought about by using an invisible guy in the sky. The atheist reported “Büllshït!” we've been inquiring for info ever considering that. You in no way presented any... Cos in case you probably did have some you won't could desire to tug the "have faith" card. you are the folk insisting an imaginary little bushy-nosed psychopath is swooping approximately in the ether doing the worst achieveable mayhem on harmless babies... no longer I? If I informed you I had a Pixie in my pocket i'm confident you will possibly ask to work out it.. So what we are asking is... produce your Pixie ;)” Frank Zindler: keep in mind that the burden of info is on the guy alleging the existence of a few thing. If somebody tells me that the Easter Bunny is hiding in somebody's clothing closet someplace in North usa, there is not any want for me to seek each and every closet on the continent. the guy making the declare has to offer the rabbit or end dropping my time. ~
2016-10-08 23:13:29 · answer #2 · answered by hedberg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It just amazes me how many answers questions like this get. Some trying to be helpful, some not, some downright snotty.
Simply stated, atheists call Christians illogical because atheists and Christians are applying different standards of logic. It's like people speaking two different languages, and each thinks the other is speaking a -foreign- language.
Was the rest of your post meant to be related to the question? You should know that at one time Newton's laws of physics were considered to be anti-religious! If he hadn't lived in liberal, open-minded England, Newton might well have been forced to recant, as Galileo was, or perhaps even burned at the stake, as Galileo nearly was.
2007-07-31 20:54:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You sound like a troll, the way you're throwing all sorts of random bits and pieces. Oh wait, a few Christians do that too, so maybe you're for real.
IF natural laws prove G-d's existence, they in no way proves Christianity. That religion contains stunning 'logical' moves like an omnipotent being who created a form of eternal torture so diabolical that the only escape is believing that the same omnipotent being murdered his offspring.
Is that really the example you want to live your life by?
2007-07-31 20:54:55 · answer #4 · answered by The angels have the phone box. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What? I don't understant the question! What on earth are you suggesting?
I should also point out that Newton's laws ar not true. Newtonian motion is only an approximation of nature (Einstein's relativty theories are much better). I think that this *disproves* your argument. You say "Newton's law is true therefore god exists". I retort with "Newton's laws are *not* true", so by your logic, god does not exist.
2007-07-31 20:48:47 · answer #5 · answered by Ali 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your argument for proof of god is weak. We do not know all of the laws of the universe or existence. One reason I believe Christians could be called illogical is because of the concept of blind faith. Blind faith means to believe in something without proof. Religious leaders do not cite Newton's laws as proof of god. They tell you to believe what they say because it's in the bible and that those are gods words. That's not proof.
2007-07-31 21:10:38 · answer #6 · answered by p c 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We don't pick on Christians, all belief in gods is illogical. You explain why you don't believe in Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, Dionysos, Quetzalcoatl, Baal or Thor and then use the same arguments on your god. You will then see the logic in not believing in gods.
2007-07-31 20:50:49 · answer #7 · answered by tentofield 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
"E=mc^2 and Newton’s laws are true. It proves God's exist "
This, sonny, is why we call you illogical and worse, dumb as a brick.
2007-07-31 20:51:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That doesn't prove God, that just proves there must be a starting force. There's no reason it has to be a supernatural cause and there's no evidence to suggest that it was.
2007-07-31 23:08:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
1+1+1 cant be equal 1
2007-07-31 20:44:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋