well theres this grading thing and you subtract points depending on if it has certain bad things and then add [extra credit] if it has good things
here are the scores
the score is 117% for the authority sub brand i feed my dog
its actually better then wellness, canidae and other good natural foods
so why are people saying its bad?
2007-07-31 20:08:14 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pets ➔ Dogs
first ingredient - Chicken
2007-07-31 20:23:29 · update #1
first ingredient - Chicken
2007-07-31 20:23:34 · update #2
its good these are health freaks
2007-08-01 00:59:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I've never actually used one of those scoring systems. But the reason is probably because of the ingredients. Better foods, such as Wellness and Canidae, have a higher quality of ingredients. Authority has things in it that dogs shouldn't be eating. And if I remember correctly the first two ingredients are not a meat, which they should be in good foods.
2007-08-01 03:17:54 · answer #2 · answered by dogluver8906 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You should share the whole ingredient list so we can tell you what the bad ingredients are. I feed my dogs Merrick and Wellness. I make sure there is no corn, by products or anything that just does not sound like I would eat it myself.
2007-08-01 05:52:02 · answer #3 · answered by sweetangelgreeneyes 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋