I like Tom Tancredo
2007-07-31 17:19:01 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
You bet.Why upon why would I want to give creedence toIlleagals from any country who are given more advantages w/healthcare,drivers licenses,wellfare,foodstamps..this list is infinate..than this countrries own citizens?I has to stop.It isn't the United States fault Mexicos economy is tragic.Minimum schools,busines,industry..etc.Why come here for a n easy buck,and retire back to their own country like a king?It's a form of stealing.in a way.
2007-07-31 18:28:17 · answer #1 · answered by effminorseven 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I will not vote for a candidate simply because i think that person is tough. Tom Tancredo is moron. Tancredo is actually pro immigration if you thnk about it because if it werent for immigrants he would have nothing to get simpletons to vote for him. He is using immigrants to try and further his career.
2007-07-31 18:27:25 · answer #2 · answered by samiam 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tancredo can't appeal to everyone therefore, cannot win an election. Thompson can because of his previous celebrity status..Ron Paul can as well garner votes from both sides or those that are moderates. My choice? Ron Paul. Pro-gun, pro-American business and against illegal immigration. I'm sure he will do a better job than Bush.
2007-07-31 17:29:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Anti illegal immigration, yes. The most important issue to the majority of Americans, and the right and left are unaware and will be blind sided. The left is so preoccupied with hating Bush and with the war, they will loose the election by not paying attention to this issue. But both sides are after the illegal vote. Pretty sad.
Yes, illegals can vote. All they need is a utility bill. No proof of citizenship is required.
2007-07-31 17:34:12 · answer #4 · answered by John himself 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ethnic applicants have been voted into parliament yet tutor me one that has stood up for the actuality while it replaced into his party that replaced into to blame for an foul up.? Ethnic applicants are very docile and are in basic terms happy to be elected . The Hanwell and Southall candidate disadvantaged this city of yet another Councillor because of the fact he nevertheless operates as a councillor and attracts a significant earnings from final as a Councillor + MP.. you will possibly hardly see him at a councillors venue. that doesn't rely ,he nevertheless can draw finished remuneration. funds is the glue. and prefer the expenses Scandal they made it criminal for an MP to function in the two jobs might desire to they % to . I even have greater effective possibilities
2016-10-13 07:43:20 · answer #5 · answered by herrion 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, not an anti-immigration candidate. An ANTI ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION candidate.
That's something completely different. You cannot stop immigration. That only happens in North Korea and we all know why.
What if you fell in love with a person from another country and you wanted to bring that person to the US.. would you still be ANTI-IMMIGRATION????
It wouldn't be nice if your 'tough anti-immigration' government, the one you voted for, stopped you from doing that.. would it.
It's important that people know the difference.
.
2007-07-31 17:30:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Anti illegal immigration and legal immigration reform yes.
Its the most important issue period. more important than all other issues combined. And I would challenge anyone to demostrate otherwise.
No other issues has such a profound effect on the future of the USA. The war in Iraq doesnt even come close.
You and your kid's, if you have any, future regarding education, economy, healthcare, crime , housing, jobs and unemployment are all heavily effected by this.
2007-07-31 17:26:16 · answer #7 · answered by sociald 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Yep, I would have. Robert Vasquez from Idaho, Canyon county. He got totally shut down by the Republican Party in the state of Idaho. Great candidate, but neither party wants to claim him. He tried to sue the Mexican consulate for monies that ILLEGALS owe to the county for services not entitled to them. Here's to a legal pissed about illegals!!!!!
2007-07-31 19:19:32 · answer #8 · answered by bigDcowgirl 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I will vote for the candidate who will secure our borders to stop terrorists and illegals from crossing our borders. I will vote for the candidate who deports all illegals and fines all businesses who hire illegals with a very heavy fine per illegal and gives jail time for continued offenses. No amnesty. No Dream Act. No permission to drive - especially since they are uninsured. No renting to illegals. No hospital care unless it's a real emergency. No school benefits. No food stamps. No welfare. No 'anchor baby'. No more stolen Ids and insurance. No more excuses.
You can view the candidates' stance on the issues here:
http://www.yournextpresident.net/thefacts.php
You can vote for a Republican this week and Democrat next week here in this public poll.
http://www.freedomworks.org//strawpoll//
2007-07-31 17:34:51 · answer #9 · answered by Naturescent 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Immigration isn't my only concern, but I will definitely vote for a candidate that is serious about resolving the issue.
2007-07-31 17:23:47 · answer #10 · answered by asdfjkl; 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋